nordvpn VS openvpn-pihole

All the infos you need are on the github page > https://github.com/bubuntux/nordvpn

Issues · bubuntux/nordvpn (github.com)

On https://github.com/bubuntux/nordvpn it mentions that token login is also supported (Nord v3.15.0+). I've used the token login and it works well for me.

There has been an issue reported on github: https://github.com/bubuntux/nordvpn/issues/367

Two of the popular containers are https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun and https://github.com/bubuntux/nordvpn but it's not clear if either of them can use meshnet.

A ubuntu/debian vm with nordvpn official client, use iptables to forward this connection to the vm IP. I've seen a similar approach using docker here https://github.com/bubuntux/nordvpn but this only shares connection to other dockers ct's in the same setup

I setup a openvpn-pihole docker combo container onto my cloud VPS, which has a public static IP. Pihole must run behind VPN and I am only interested in dns queries, in other terms I don't want my internet traffic get routed by the VPN server. I read everywhere that I should comment out this line in the server.conf file (and I did do):

if you know how to create and maintain an open vpn server of course the self-hosted solution is better, any other vpn provider can use your data beyond your knowing, big problem is that they host servers all over the world so in its "vpn server" they have deferent rules from the country that they are located, so if we speak about personal integrity you can host your service in Europe where the gdpr is very restricted about personal data. If you are open to suggestions about the server provider I recommend you hertzner. For me personal for everyday use I use my self-hosted open-vpn/ pihole(inside the vpn with docker) and for multimedia consumption, I use proton vpn to have access to content from all over the world.