noVNC VS Tiger VNC

I setup tigervnc server on both my linux and windows machinces , then use websockify and noVNC to access them whenever i want through my web browser. you can follow readme of novnc here. If other pcs are on a seperate network or behind a NAT i suggest using frp hosted on a vps (That is what i did) .

The rfb.js can be found on the official noVNC Repo and the file HTB uses includes the appropriate credit, so they're definitely not trying to seal credit or anything (RFP is the protocol behind VNC). Most interestingly is how well the flow is between the browser session and the normal host desktop; mostly how seamless copy/paste is. NoVNC has a tab on the left that handles all the config and controls, as well as how it does copy/paste. There's some snazzy lines in vnc.min.js that take care of it, but I'll leave that dissection as an exercise to the reader (or if y'all want, I can dive into that one as well).

How about noVNC, MeshCentral, or myrtille?

noVNC https://github.com/novnc/noVNC/ works really well even in limited setup (through proxies, VPN, no client install env, etc). Pretty easy to setup on Linux machines, elsewhere I don't know.

I use wayvnc (VNC server for wl-roots based WMs) together with novnc (VNC client which allows web connections via browser). both would run on the computer. This allows any device with a decent browser to control the computer.

git clone https://github.com/novnc/noVNC/ cd noVNC npm update node ./utils/use_require.js --as amd --clean

I wonder how this compares to NoVNC, which is an opensource browser based VNC

Here is VNC over HTTP. VNC is for remote control. VNC client is complete in web browser powered by noVNC project. The application below also provides E2E encryption using openssl aes-256-ctr-command-compatible way which encrypts streamingly.

This has been around for a while and so far RealVNC does not have a fix. It's possible that something like TigerVNC [their site] may cope but I've not tried it.

PS. OpenBSD comes with vmctl, it is a tool like Docker or Qubes VMs. You can jail Firefox inside a VM then connect to their GUI desktop via tigervnc. But I believe, it is too paranoid. Separate user and separate disk partition for Firefox is more than sufficient, given OpenBSD paranoid approach to the application address spaces.

https://github.com/TigerVNC/tigervnc/issues/662 which still shows OPEN.

Tried TigerVNC but I wont even connect.

Its probably a problem with your vnc server Maybe this could help.

Create a file called config and add one option each line if you need to give the VNC server more choices. Here's an illustration: Edit ~/.vnc/config

You can use vnc