nfs-subdir-external-provisioner VS flux2

Using nfs-subdir-external-provisioner instead of csi-driver-nfs

I am trying to run sonarr inside my k3s cluster. Since I have multiple nodes, in order to keep data persistant I have been using a NAS and the Kubernetes NFS external provisioner as my Storage Class.

There's this, if you want your nfs storage available to pods as PVCs, with some limitations: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/nfs-subdir-external-provisioner

NFS Provisioner

Depends on how much resiliency you need . Something like https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/nfs-subdir-external-provisioner works well for a lab or non-prod cluster. You could even use something like this in prod if you have access to highly reliably NFS mounts.

I first installed a NFS Server via this helm chart: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/nfs-subdir-external-provisioner Eventually I deployed Longhorn cause I needed expandable volumes, which the first repo doesn't support. I guess for best performance you should go for a ceph cluster, but I'm not an expert.

I used the NFS provisioner for persistent volumes until I got the Ceph side up and running. I created a share on my NAS specifically for k8s. It worked very well and had the bonus of being just a regular file system that you could browse/edit easily (just place files in or edit config). I would agree with not moving plex into k8s. I right now just have a barebones 1 control 2 worker setup using k3s.

However, is it too difficult to create new pods/deployments etc on your own? I find it super easy to just create a PVC (via https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/nfs-subdir-external-provisioner ) and create a MySQL pod in a new namespace for every micro service I create.

This is what you need https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/nfs-subdir-external-provisioner Point it to a folder and it will create subfolders for each PVC.

Given the team had already adopted GitOps and were familiar with deployments powered by Helm Releases and Flux, we wanted to move the provisioning of the infrastructure to be part of the same process of creating the service and its continuous deployment.

Your GitHub action can trigger a helm chart, or series thereof, or other infra tools. Declarative specifications, triggered procedurally with the context of the branch’s latest build. We use this pattern quite extensively for preview app workflows.

As of a year ago this is possible in a fully declarative way with Flux 2, but there’s a lot more moving parts and security footguns - and the idea that the maintenance of this project has lost one of its primary sponsors is worrying at best.

https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2/discussions/831

https://blog.kluctl.io/introducing-the-template-controller-a...

FluxCD - FluxCD is another popular GitOps tool that allows developers to use a Git repository as the sole source of configuration. Flux automatically ensures that the state of the Kubernetes cluster is synchronized with the configuration in the Git repository. It supports automatic updates, meaning Flux can monitor Docker image repositories for new images and push updates to the cluster.

#!/bin/bash aws eks update-kubeconfig --name $CLUSTER_NAME --region $AWS_REGION flux_installed=$(kubectl api-resources | grep flux) if [ -z "$flux_installed" ]; then echo "flux is not installed" curl -s https://fluxcd.io/install.sh | sudo bash flux bootstrap github \ --owner=$GH_USER_NAME \ --repository=$FLUX_REPO_NAME \ --path="clusters/$ENVIRONMENT/$CLUSTER_NAME/bootstrap" \ --branch=main \ --personal else echo "flux is installed" fi

Flux CD enables continuous deployment to Kubernetes through GitOps by syncing Git repositories with Kubernetes clusters. Flux CD enables GitOps for Kubernetes through source control integration. It manages Kubernetes manifests as code and syncs git repo changes to clusters. Flux automates checks, deployments, and updates within clusters.

FluxCD is a GitOps tool developed by Weaveworks that allows you to implement continuous and progressive delivery of your applications on Kubernetes. It is a CNCF graduated project that offers a set of controllers to monitor Git repositories and reconciles the cluster's actual state with the desired state defined by manifests committed in the repo.

From here, we can explore other developments and tutorials on Kubernetes, such as o11y or observability (PLG, ELK, ELF, TICK, Jaeger, Pyroscope), service mesh (Linkerd, Istio, NSM, Consul Connect, Cillium), and progressive delivery (ArgoCD, FluxCD, Spinnaker).

Instead, we will create a single long-lived cluster, and deploy our application in different namespaces. There are a bunch of ways to do that - see ArgoCD, Flux, custom internal tooling, or other solutions (we use our own product). That way, we:

One is to make sure configurations in both clusters is same. And for that there are many tools like fluxcd or projectsveltos