docker VS self-hosted_docker_setups

Am I better off using this container: https://hub.docker.com/_/nextcloud/

It looks like I'm not the only person who has faced this. apache-based images require buster, for instance, and some docker images that rely on Ruby face issues too (for example, I decided to try setting up Postal but it looks like it's facing the same issues).

If you look at the info on https://hub.docker.com/_/nextcloud, you'll see that you aught to be specifying at least one volume, so that you have the data you want to not disappear on restart, and can access config files.

Yes, and this is what L passed through as the env variables in the docker compose file, as the docs state: https://hub.docker.com/_/nextcloud

You can't map binaries from host to container like this. What you need is a custom Dockerfile that installs ffmpeg. https://github.com/nextcloud/docker/blob/master/.examples/dockerfiles/full/fpm/Dockerfile

A good example to start with is at https://github.com/nextcloud/docker/tree/master/.examples/docker-compose/insecure/postgres/apache

Nextcloud is free and open source. The easiest way to install it is via docker containers. nextcloud docker

Not OP but all the config is on the original post's OP's github: https://github.com/abhilesh/self-hosted_docker_setups/.

I've uploaded a docker-compose file for the SurfShark+Transmission+qBittorrent+*Arr stack here - https://github.com/abhilesh/self-hosted_docker_setups

Credits to r/selfhosted, pi-hosted, self-hosted_docker_setups

This might be of help to you

This repo has a lot of pre-made docker compose files. I'd recommend starting with AdGuard-Home, Homer, Watchtower, and Code-Server (if you code).

I consolidated all the docker-compose + any additional configuration files for these apps on GitHub to serve as reference. Here's the link to the repo - https://github.com/abhilesh/self-hosted_docker_setups

Here's the docker-compose - https://github.com/abhilesh/self-hosted_docker_setups/tree/main/vikunja