nanohttpd VS StreamEx

Compare nanohttpd vs StreamEx and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
nanohttpd StreamEx
2 2
6,827 2,146
0.4% -
0.0 6.4
9 months ago 12 days ago
Java Java
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

nanohttpd

Posts with mentions or reviews of nanohttpd. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-01-17.

StreamEx

Posts with mentions or reviews of StreamEx. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-21.
  • Favorite hidden gem library?
    22 projects | /r/java | 21 Oct 2022
    I really like StreamEx. I do not know why people do not use it often, the syntax is just wonderful.
  • Jodd – The Unbearable Lightness of Java
    12 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 17 Jan 2022
    It gets more perverse if you need to flatMap, or transmute components of map types, etc. If you want even more power, take a look at https://github.com/amaembo/streamex. This sort of container manipulation bread and butter for business processing. I use it every day, sometimes with a dozen operations. This (with liberal use of `final` values) makes for some pretty functional-looking code.

    I'll grant you the Kotlin or Scala version is slightly more compact. But not fundamentally different, like the Go version.

    I (and the pretty much every language designer in the post-Java era) disagree with you about checked exceptions, but that's a whole different thread...

What are some alternatives?

When comparing nanohttpd and StreamEx you can also consider the following projects:

Jetty - Eclipse Jetty® - Web Container & Clients - supports HTTP/2, HTTP/1.1, HTTP/1.0, websocket, servlets, and more

jOOλ - jOOλ - The Missing Parts in Java 8 jOOλ improves the JDK libraries in areas where the Expert Group's focus was elsewhere. It adds tuple support, function support, and a lot of additional functionality around sequential Streams. The JDK 8's main efforts (default methods, lambdas, and the Stream API) were focused around maintaining backwards compatibility and implementing a functional API for parallelism.

Apache Tomcat - Apache Tomcat

Javaslang - vʌvr (formerly called Javaslang) is a non-commercial, non-profit object-functional library that runs with Java 8+. It aims to reduce the lines of code and increase code quality.

WildFly - WildFly Application Server

derive4j - Java 8 annotation processor and framework for deriving algebraic data types constructors, pattern-matching, folds, optics and typeclasses.

piranha - Piranha - a modern cloud runtime

protonpack - Stream utilities for Java 8

Apache TomEE - Apache TomEE

underscore-java - java port of Underscore.js

Netty - Netty project - an event-driven asynchronous network application framework

Functional Java - Backport of Java 8's lambda expressions to Java 7, 6 and 5