nano-community VS nanowallet

Nano foundation will be dismantled soon, they have very little funding left and it's a good thing, we don't need them. Colin is a coder just like the rest of us, he's very talented and at the right time at the right place with the right idea but we can't depend on him forever. The community will take over. https://nano.community

And https://nano.community are both pretty good resources in general

Sources and calculations: Energy per bitcoin transaction: 734 kWh (https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption ) (4 day average, 08.02.2023) Energy consumption of the nano network based on TPD by principal representatives: 57 kWh/day (https://nano.community) (4 day average, 08.02.2023) Sustainable tps by the nano network: 20.5 tps (https://nanotps.com) (08.02.2023) 1,771,200 transactions per day (including 1 send and 1 receive block per transaction) results in 0.0322 Wh average energy consumption per transaction (network only) Energy for PoW generation of a send block: 0.0147 Wh Energy for PoW generation of a receive block (1/64th difficulty of send): 0.000230 Wh (tested by community member Ricki) Total energy for 1 nano transaction: 0.0322 Wh + 0.0147 Wh + 0.000230 Wh = 0.0471 Wh 734 kWh / 0.0471 Wh = 15,583,864 To make this more tangible with 0.0471 Wh (1 nano transaction) you can     *Use a waffle maker for 0.1 s *Power a 50 W LED lightbulb for 3 s *Drive a Tesla Model S for 22 cm Special thanks to Ricki (PoW data and idea for this scene), trashman (TPD calculations and data from nano.community) and Pilsner_Maxwell (original concept for the nano-energy-cubes from 2 years ago). Song: Kevin MacLeod - Black Vortex

https://nano.community/ states a 2.375 kWh/day thermal dissipation power (TDP) of all PRs based on their CPU model infos.

My articles (https://senatus.substack.com/) provide a fair bit of extra background as well, and the Nano blog (https://nano.org/en/blog) has a lot more articles. There's also the community-run Nano.community (https://nano.community/).

Here are the stats I'm planning to work on: https://github.com/mistakia/nano-community/discussions/32

With nano, we have a truly great community project called Nano.Community (https://nano.community/) which is entirely hosted on Github. Simply fork the project, make your changes according to the contribution guidlines and boom. You're helping in the best possible way you can. If you feel up to it, you can contribute directly to the nano foundation living whitepaper, too.

I'm hoping to do just that, build a test mobile wallet, sometime in the near future (https://github.com/mistakia/nanowallet)

I was planning on testing this out sometime in the future by building it into a privacy-minded mobile wallet: https://github.com/mistakia/nanowallet

Practically speaking, most wallet applications are dependent on a node to know the state of the ledger. The natrium wallet is connected to the natrium node. The nault wallet randomly chooses a node from a pool of nodes but can be configured to connect to any node. It is possible to design a wallet that doesn't rely on a node and instead connects directly to the network and maintains its own perspective on the state of the ledger locally. I hope to make a proof of concept of that at some point in the near future. This is how the nanollet wallet worked.

I know u/t3rr0r will be working on a privacy-focused wallet similar to what Samourai does for BTC. You can see a proof of concept here: https://github.com/mistakia/nanowallet

Nano wallets can have multiple addresses as well. Nothing about the nano network limits a user or wallet developer to using one account/address, it is a choice. This is an area that needs more development as nano privacy wallets can become much more friendly, which is why I started this experiment.

Privacy focused mobile wallet — https://github.com/mistakia/nanowallet/

Nano has an interesting advantage to explore layer two and wallet based privacy solutions given its lack of fees and ease of making transactions. I've started working on a wallet as a testing bed for these strategies. I'm aware of Nanofusion and other trustless mixing strategies for other pseudonomous projects (coinjoin and cashfusion). Please share any strategies and ideas on privacy solutions to avoid reinventing the wheel.