mxe VS manylinux

Compare mxe vs manylinux and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
mxe manylinux
9 13
1,157 1,348
1.3% 2.5%
9.5 8.8
6 days ago 4 days ago
Makefile Shell
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

mxe

Posts with mentions or reviews of mxe. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-17.

manylinux

Posts with mentions or reviews of manylinux. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-13.
  • Building a go program with an older glibc
    1 project | /r/golang | 7 Feb 2023
    I use manylinux containers as the OS for compilation. It tries to ensure as much cross-os / libc / etc.. as much as possible for precompiled libraries. https://github.com/pypa/manylinux
  • Alpine Linux in the Browser
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 13 Jan 2023
    Just to clarify for anyone who isn't aware, the "compiling issues", at least historically, have been that that Alpine uses musl, and PyPI's manylinux wheels are built against old glibc versions. So stuff like numpy that would trivially and quickly install from whl on glibc distros (like a bare-bones Ubuntu image) trigger compilations and the installation of build-only dependencies on Alpine.

    That said, it looks like as of late-2021, at least some projects are offering musllinux wheels as well, per the discussion here: https://github.com/pypa/manylinux/issues/37 (not numpy, though: https://pypi.org/project/numpy/#files)

  • Because cross-compiling binaries for Windows is easier than building natively
    15 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 18 Jun 2022
    It's very hard. Incompatible glibc ABIs make this nigh impossible, there's a reason Steam installs a vcredistributable.dll for pretty much every game on Windows.

    Look no further than the hoops you need jump through to distribute a Linux binary on PyPI [1]. Despite tons of engineering effort, and tons of hoop jumping from packagers, getting a non-trivial binary to run across all distros is still considered functionally impossible.

    [1]: https://github.com/pypa/manylinux

  • manylinux_2_28 image is published
    1 project | /r/programming | 1 Jun 2022
  • manylinux_2_28 image is published (including docker environment)
    1 project | /r/linux | 1 Jun 2022
  • CPython, C standards, and IEEE 754
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Mar 2022
    As a user, if you build every python package from source, it's ok. But if you a maintainer of an OSS project and you need to publish binary packages for it, then you will hit the trouble. Binaries built on Ubuntu 20.04 can only support Ubuntu 20.04 and newer. So you'd better to choose an older Linux release to target broader users. Now most python packages choose CentOS 6 or 7. See https://github.com/pypa/manylinux/issues/1012 for more details. They need help!
  • Using Zig as Cross Platform C Toolchain
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 27 Feb 2022
    I recently learned that Clang supports this kind of cross-compiling out of the box. https://mcilloni.ovh/2021/02/09/cxx-cross-clang/

    The main difference is that Clang does not ship with headers/libraries for different platforms, as Zig appears to do. You need to give Clang a "sysroot" -- a path that has the headers/libraries for the platform you want to compile for.

    If you create a bunch of sysroots for various architectures, you can do some pretty "easy" cross-compiling with just a single compiler binary. Docker can be a nice way of packaging up these sysroots (especially combined with Docker images like manylinux: https://github.com/pypa/manylinux). Gone are the days when you had to build a separate GCC cross-compiler for each platform you want to target.

  • “LLVM-Libc” C Standard Library
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Dec 2021
  • 'Python: Please stop screwing over Linux distros'
    9 projects | /r/programming | 16 Nov 2021
    Now you come and use manylinux to build. (https://github.com/pypa/manylinux) so you are based on the CentOS 7 toolchain (at best if you use manylinux2014) or Debian 9 toolchain (if you use manylinux_2_24).
  • Building Outer Wonders for Linux
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 May 2021
    I think the generally accepted way to do that would be a container image running a relatively old distribution. This is exactly what python packages do when they need to distribute binary packages on linux [0]. You are supposed to compile the package in a container (or VM) that runs CentOS 7 (or older if you want broader support), although now the baseline is moving gradually to Debian 9.

    [0]: https://github.com/pypa/manylinux

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mxe and manylinux you can also consider the following projects:

llvm-mingw - An LLVM/Clang/LLD based mingw-w64 toolchain

auditwheel - Auditing and relabeling cross-distribution Linux wheels.

seer - Seer - a gui frontend to gdb

musl-cross-make - Simple makefile-based build for musl cross compiler

quasi-msys2 - Cross-compile C/C++ from Linux to Windows using MSYS2 packages

glibc_version_header - Build portable Linux binaries without using an ancient distro

displaylink-rpm - RPM sources for the DisplayLink USB display adapters

lhelper - A simple utility to helps compile and install C/C++ libraries on Windows and Linux

SDL - Simple Directmedia Layer

ded - Dramatic EDitor

padio - Zero pad numeric filenames