monadless VS ureq

Compare monadless vs ureq and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
monadless ureq
4 7
275 1,559
0.4% -
0.0 8.4
about 2 months ago 6 days ago
Scala Rust
Apache License 2.0 Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

monadless

Posts with mentions or reviews of monadless. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-08-11.
  • "A New Library For Imperative ZIO Programming" by Alexander Ioffe at Functional Scala 2022
    1 project | /r/scala | 10 Jan 2023
  • Kind: A Modern Proof Language
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Aug 2021
    Well `RecordWildcards` has been around for 14 years... but even without it instead of `{..}` you'd just have `_`s. The main thing that is different is that your Kind example had nested case statements while your Haskell example tried to match everything on one shot, which makes for a non-equivalent comparison.

    > Not sure how that could work, though. Idris had an interesting syntax, but IIRC it wasn't general.

    I assume you're talking about idiom brackets for applicatives? The general syntax is given in something like https://github.com/monadless/monadless. The idea is to basically take async-await syntax and generalize it to any monad.

    So e.g. your `Maybe` example (using `!` for the equivalent of `await` for concision) would look like

      Maybe {
  • Why asynchronous Rust doesn't work
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 9 Mar 2021
    > If anything, async-await feels like an extremely non-functional thing to begin with

    It, like many other things, forms a monad. In fact async-await is a specialization of various monad syntactic sugars that try to eliminate long callback chains.

    Hence things like Haskell's do-notation are direct precursors to async-await (some libraries such as Scala's monadless https://github.com/monadless/monadless make it even more explicit, there lift and unlift are exactly generalized versions of async and await).

ureq

Posts with mentions or reviews of ureq. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-29.
  • Thermostat Control for Ecobee
    2 projects | /r/rust | 29 May 2023
    I also enjoyed using ureq as an http client.
  • An HTTP request parser with rust and pest.rs
    6 projects | dev.to | 23 May 2022
    After a quick check of the available rust http client libraries I opted for reqwest. It has a pretty simple API and it seems to be among the most used libraries for this matters. But I'm a bit concerned about all its dependencies so I might try ureq later.
  • Why asynchronous Rust doesn't work
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 9 Mar 2021
  • HTTP-client agnostic crate
    1 project | /r/rust | 8 Mar 2021
    Async is only useful when you have hundreds of connections open at the same time and idling most of the time; otherwise it's a liability. If your web API does not allow that (e.g. it has rate-limiting, which most APIs do), I suggest going with a client that performs blocking I/O and spawning threads if you need parallelism. https://github.com/algesten/ureq should fit the bill.
  • Client/Server Communication Help
    1 project | /r/rust | 18 Feb 2021
    I think you'll find a lot of people claiming its overkill, but it will have excellent documentation for both sides, offer reasonable speed, and let you hash out the actual logic of your system without worrying too much about if your low-level implementation is correct. Two good frameworks for the server would be Actix or Rocket. For the client, i'd reccomend either using reqwest or ureq. From there, you can just set up a few POST endpoints, and get to going.
  • http client facade library?
    3 projects | /r/rust | 5 Feb 2021
    If you want an HTTP client with few dependencies and little unsafe code, take a look at https://github.com/algesten/ureq
  • Tokio, the async runtime for Rust, hits 1.0
    12 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Dec 2020

What are some alternatives?

When comparing monadless and ureq you can also consider the following projects:

async-trait - Type erasure for async trait methods

reqwest - An easy and powerful Rust HTTP Client

py2many - Transpiler of Python to many other languages

hyper - An HTTP library for Rust

blog-comments - Comments for the blog at theta.eu.org.

curl-rust - Rust bindings to libcurl

Formality - A modern proof language [Moved to: https://github.com/kind-lang/Kind]

rust-http-clients-smoke-test

rupy - HTTP App. Server and JSON DB - Shared Parallel (Atomic) & Distributed

teepee - Teepee, the Rust HTTP toolkit

smol - A small and fast async runtime for Rust