monadless VS hyper

Compare monadless vs hyper and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
monadless hyper
4 97
275 13,804
0.4% 1.7%
0.0 9.2
about 2 months ago 2 days ago
Scala Rust
Apache License 2.0 MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

monadless

Posts with mentions or reviews of monadless. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-08-11.
  • "A New Library For Imperative ZIO Programming" by Alexander Ioffe at Functional Scala 2022
    1 project | /r/scala | 10 Jan 2023
  • Kind: A Modern Proof Language
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Aug 2021
    Well `RecordWildcards` has been around for 14 years... but even without it instead of `{..}` you'd just have `_`s. The main thing that is different is that your Kind example had nested case statements while your Haskell example tried to match everything on one shot, which makes for a non-equivalent comparison.

    > Not sure how that could work, though. Idris had an interesting syntax, but IIRC it wasn't general.

    I assume you're talking about idiom brackets for applicatives? The general syntax is given in something like https://github.com/monadless/monadless. The idea is to basically take async-await syntax and generalize it to any monad.

    So e.g. your `Maybe` example (using `!` for the equivalent of `await` for concision) would look like

      Maybe {
  • Why asynchronous Rust doesn't work
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 9 Mar 2021
    > If anything, async-await feels like an extremely non-functional thing to begin with

    It, like many other things, forms a monad. In fact async-await is a specialization of various monad syntactic sugars that try to eliminate long callback chains.

    Hence things like Haskell's do-notation are direct precursors to async-await (some libraries such as Scala's monadless https://github.com/monadless/monadless make it even more explicit, there lift and unlift are exactly generalized versions of async and await).

hyper

Posts with mentions or reviews of hyper. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-18.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing monadless and hyper you can also consider the following projects:

async-trait - Type erasure for async trait methods

reqwest - An easy and powerful Rust HTTP Client

py2many - Transpiler of Python to many other languages

tokio - A runtime for writing reliable asynchronous applications with Rust. Provides I/O, networking, scheduling, timers, ...

blog-comments - Comments for the blog at theta.eu.org.

Warp - Warp is a modern, Rust-based terminal with AI built in so you and your team can build great software, faster.

ureq - A simple, safe HTTP client

actix-web - Actix Web is a powerful, pragmatic, and extremely fast web framework for Rust.

Formality - A modern proof language [Moved to: https://github.com/kind-lang/Kind]

Rocket - A web framework for Rust.

rupy - HTTP App. Server and JSON DB - Shared Parallel (Atomic) & Distributed

curl-rust - Rust bindings to libcurl