mobx-react VS use-context-selector

Um, hello, MobX? You don't have to like it but it has 6x the weekly downloads as Recoil does, so it should at least be mentioned.

Use jotai, or as someone else mentioned, zustand. React Context out of the box requires a very deliberate mental model due to a lack of tooling around selecting slices of state. This is why packages like react-context-selector exist: https://github.com/dai-shi/use-context-selector

Unless I've missed it, context doesn't have selector IIRC. You'd have to use a third party solution useContextSelector

How does this differ from https://github.com/dai-shi/use-context-selector?

you can always split out context state or use a library to help with rerender issues like https://github.com/dai-shi/use-context-selector, or just switch to jotai or something else if you want something more ergonomic or better design patterns.

If you don't want to swap out useContext, you could always use useContextSelector, which helps you limit what props in the context should rerender the component.

I wouldn't call this easy

It wouldn't be clear to anyone learning Context API either. At least, not using official docs. Because Context API is not supposed for state management, and if you for some unknown reasons try to roll your own state management on top of it, you have to use tricky libraries to work around the issues resulting from such abuse.

Any time anything in the context changes, any component that is consuming it will re-render. If you use it for frequently changed values, this library is needed to reduce unnecessary re-renders.

Use of this implementation of useContextSelector

Another technology I use regularly is Redux. But this time I wanted to manage the global state in a simpler and clearer way just using React hooks. I decided to go with a simple useReducer combined with theuseContextSelector hook which will avoid the whole application’s re-render caused by the native useContext hook.