mitosis VS zig

Builder.io Mitosis -

In this case, we combined a fine-tuned LLM, a custom compiler that we wrote, and a custom-trained model.

The heart of Visual Copilot lies in its AI models and a specialized compiler. The initial model, trained with over 2 million data points, transforms flat design structures into code hierarchies. Our open-source compiler, Mitosis, takes this structured hierarchy and compiles it into code. In the final pass, a finely tuned Large Language Model (LLM) refines the code to match your specific framework and styling preferences. This multi-stage process ensures that the generated code is high-quality and tailored to meet the requirements of your project.

Mitosis (https://github.com/BuilderIO/mitosis) is a fantastic project, but is still in its early stages, and in need of some build tooling. It allows you to "write once, run everywhere" in the sense that you can write a UI component and have it compiled to a React component for use in a React project, a Svelte component for use in a Svelte project, and so on. It does not, however, support bundling.

create-multi-lib (run like so `npx create-multi-lib ) is my attempt to contribute a much needed bundling-layer on top of Mitosis.

It also comes with E2E testing included, and your resulting packages include type-declarations.

Depending on your needs, check out Mitosis that let you write components and compile them to svelte, angular, react. https://github.com/BuilderIO/mitosis

Saying that, you could check-out Mitosis.

I see you was inspired by https://github.com/BuilderIO/mitosis was there no way to extend there AST?

I discovered https://github.com/BuilderIO/mitosis, and it has changed my front-end development workflow with the ability to create one development and export and test metrics on multiple front-ends delivering the best MVP possible.

There is an issue proposing this approach: https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/4284

https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/224

e.g.:

> > When debugging/prototyping, it's useful to comment out a line without having to refactor, e.g.

When writing code in a scripting language, sometimes you need that extra bit of performance (or maybe an async feature from Zig).

NodeJS is by no means a slow runtime, it wouldn’t be so popular if it was. But compared to Bun, it’s slow. Bun was built from the ground up with speed in mind, using both JavascriptCore and Zig. The Bun team spent an enormous amount of time and energy trying to make Bun fast, including lots of profiling, benchmarking, and optimizations.

ntdll.dll!RtlUserThreadStart()

There are valid reasons to use APIs from NTDLL. Where I disagree with zig#1840 is the idea that it is always better to use NTDLL versions of API. Every other software ecosystem uses the standard Win32 APIs and diverging from that without a good reason seems like a good way to have unexpected behavior. One concrete example is most users and programmers expect Windows to redirect some file system paths when running on WOW64. But this is implemented in Kernel32, not ntdll.

https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/11894

Zig also has an IRC channel on libera (#zig) that is moderated by Andrew Kelley.[1]

[1] https://github.com/ziglang/zig/wiki/Community