min-sized-rust
c2rust
Our great sponsors
min-sized-rust | c2rust | |
---|---|---|
101 | 46 | |
7,410 | 3,667 | |
- | 2.5% | |
6.2 | 9.5 | |
about 1 month ago | 4 days ago | |
Rust | Rust | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
min-sized-rust
-
The Linux Kernel Prepares for Rust 1.77 Upgrade
This is a good guide on building small Rust binaries: https://github.com/johnthagen/min-sized-rust
This talks about going to extreme lengths on making the smallest Rust binary possible, 400 bytes when it was written, https://darkcoding.net/software/a-very-small-rust-binary-ind...
The thing is, you lose a lot of nice features when you do this, like panic unwinding, debug symbols, stdlib… for kernel and some embedded development it’s definitely important, but for most use cases, does it matter?
-
Rust wont save us, but its ideas will
Oh it was 137, haha. I will link you to this older comment of mine: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29408906
-
Making Rust binaries smaller by default
Are you sure? If so then this is awesome news, but I'm a bit confused; the commit in that min-sized-rust repo adding `build-std` to the README was merged in August 2021: https://github.com/johnthagen/min-sized-rust/pull/30
Are you saying that at that point the feature still hadn't "landed in Rust nightly" until recently? If so then what's the difference between a feature just being available in Rust nightly, vs having "landed"?
-
Was Rust Worth It?
Rust binaries are by default nowhere close to 500MB. If they are not small enough for you, you can try https://github.com/johnthagen/min-sized-rust. By avoiding the formatting machinery and using `panic_immediate_abort` you can get about the size of C binaries.
-
Compiling Rust binaries for Windows 98 SE and more: a journey
A useful reference: https://github.com/johnthagen/min-sized-rust
- How to minimize Rust binary size
- Error on flashing embedded code to stm32f103
-
Tiny Binaries (2021)
That must be without stripping. Also there are ways to reduce binary size. See e.g. [min-sized-rust](https://github.com/johnthagen/min-sized-rust). I've gotten stripped binaries of small cli utils less than 400KiB without doing anything special, less than 150 KiB by customizing profile settings and compressing with upx, and less than 30 KiB by replacing the std with the libc as the link shows. Haven't tried with fltk though...
-
Shared libraries
This is not quite what you're asking, but it does also address the underlying concern: https://github.com/johnthagen/min-sized-rust
c2rust
-
Converting the Kernel to C++
A recent practical example of the former: the fish shell re-wrote incrementally from C++ to Rust, and is almost finished https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/discussions/10123
An example of the latter: c2rust, which is a work in progress but is very impressive https://github.com/immunant/c2rust
It currently translates into unsafe Rust, but the strategy is to separate the "compile C to unsafe Rust" steps and the "compile unsafe Rust to safe Rust" steps. As I see it, as it makes the overall task simpler, allows for more user freedom, and makes the latter potentially useful even for non-transpiled code. https://immunant.com/blog/2023/03/lifting/
-
Best tools to convert code between languages?
But not all transpilers are between languages where at least one of them is designed to be transpiled. For example, c2rust can transpile, as the name suggests, C to (ugly, unsafe) Rust. A while ago there was a Java -> C compiler in GCC (GCJ), but it's pretty out of date now.
-
Translate C code to Rust working with libc
I do not know about your specific issue but you may be interested by https://github.com/immunant/c2rust
-
Rewrite in Rust or Use Rust-bindings
You should also consider using C2Rust (they're even working on C -> safe Rust translation)
-
Emitting Safer Rust with C2Rust
> The date at the bottom of the article is 2022-06-13. Has there been further progress?
The article links to their github repo:
https://github.com/immunant/c2rust
There's commits in the last hour, so at least some signal of life.
-
Writing an OS in Rust to run on RISC-V
This is arguably already the state of things.
Rust might get compiled down through MIR, down through LLVM IR, down to assembly or wasm... which then might be JIT or AOT (re)compiled into other bytecodes... which might perhaps be decompiled back up to C... and C might be retranslated back to horrific unsafe-spamming Rust by the likes of https://c2rust.com/. We've come full circle!
The main issue is that retranslating high level languages into other high level languages isn't something that there's actually a lot of demand for, especially commercially, especially given the N x M translation matrix going on. So a lot of the projects "stabilize" (get abandoned). And automatically translating between the idioms of those languages gets even nastier in terms of matrix bloat.
Well, you've got stuff like MSIL and JVM bytecodes which are higher level, and preserve more type information, and can be compiled to / decompiled from while still preserving more structure, but they still form competing incompatible ecosystems.
-
Will Carbon Replace C++?
That's the wrong direction. What's needed are intelligent converters which convert less-strict languages to more-strict ones.
Non-intelligent converters just make a mess. Here's c2rust.[1]
Classic C++ to modern C++, plus a compiler flag to lock out all the old unsafe stuff, would be an achievement.
- What would you rewrite in Rust?
-
Red Black Tree in Rust
Well, technically, it's not hard to build such data structures. If you are willing to liberally use raw pointers, UnsafeCell, MaybeUninit and ManuallyDrop, then you can more-or-less write C-equivalent code in unsafe Rust. (there are even transpilers from C to Rust)
-
In Rust We Trust – A Transpiler from Unsafe C to Safer Rust
/uj This transpiles from C to unsafe Rust using an existing tool, then strips the unsafe keyword from the generated function signatures
What are some alternatives?
smartstring - Compact inlined strings for Rust.
subsurface - This is the official upstream of the Subsurface divelog program
Cargo - The Rust package manager
librope - UTF-8 rope library for C
rustc_codegen_gcc - libgccjit AOT codegen for rustc
checkedc - Checked C is an extension to C that lets programmers write C code that is guaranteed by the compiler to be type-safe. The goal is to let people easily make their existing C code type-safe and eliminate entire classes of errors. Checked C does not address use-after-free errors. This repo has a wiki for Checked C, sample code, the specification, and test code.
regex - An implementation of regular expressions for Rust. This implementation uses finite automata and guarantees linear time matching on all inputs.
zz - 🍺🐙 ZetZ a zymbolic verifier and tranzpiler to bare metal C [Moved to: https://github.com/zetzit/zz]
embedded-graphics - A no_std graphics library for embedded applications
rtorrent - rTorrent BitTorrent client
tiny-rust-executable - Using Rust to make a 137-byte static AMD64 Linux executable
langs