mediacms VS tubesync

Last, host something like https://github.com/mediacms-io/mediacms to serve the optimized files. As long as your clients are not halfway across the world, they should be able to watch the videos with relative ease.

MediaCMS might just be what you are looking for

https://mediacms.io/ is the link.

Sounds like a self hosted youtube could do that. Haven’t tried this yet but someone mentioned it a couple days ago here. https://github.com/mediacms-io/mediacms

Hey, Paul, the only thing I've seen for this on this subreddit or similar places is Media CMS. I don't believe that there is a way to add an ad banner, but I don't know how that works at all, so perhaps there is. Otherwise, videos are rendered in different resolutions to save bandwidth (pre-transcoded when you upload); users indeed are able to upload photos, videos, documents even; download is possible of the content in original, is a Docker compose stack; rendering via GPU can indeed be done via Docker.

I am looking for an app for a similar problem and the best solution I found was mediacms. Unfortunately the setup is not really easy and I couldn't get it to work.

https://github.com/meeb/tubesync

It will automatically download new videos from any public channel or playlist.

When I tried to do that with TubeSync (https://github.com/meeb/tubesync) I got this error and the container would be "unhealthy" and never start.

tubesync

Quelqu'un d'autre utilise-t-il TupesYnc? https://github.com/meeb/tubesync

Someone mentioned "TubeSync" earlier in the thread, for the sonarr-equivalent of subscribing to YouTube channels. Not what I was after but sounds like what you want :)

this one, right? https://github.com/meeb/tubesync

Check out Tubearchvist or something like ytdl-sub or Tube Sync paired with a media player like Jellyfin.

Check out TubeSync.