mediacms VS YoutubeDL-Material

Last, host something like https://github.com/mediacms-io/mediacms to serve the optimized files. As long as your clients are not halfway across the world, they should be able to watch the videos with relative ease.

MediaCMS might just be what you are looking for

https://mediacms.io/ is the link.

Sounds like a self hosted youtube could do that. Haven’t tried this yet but someone mentioned it a couple days ago here. https://github.com/mediacms-io/mediacms

Hey, Paul, the only thing I've seen for this on this subreddit or similar places is Media CMS. I don't believe that there is a way to add an ad banner, but I don't know how that works at all, so perhaps there is. Otherwise, videos are rendered in different resolutions to save bandwidth (pre-transcoded when you upload); users indeed are able to upload photos, videos, documents even; download is possible of the content in original, is a Docker compose stack; rendering via GPU can indeed be done via Docker.

I am looking for an app for a similar problem and the best solution I found was mediacms. Unfortunately the setup is not really easy and I couldn't get it to work.

this the one I use: https://github.com/Tzahi12345/YoutubeDL-Material

There are a few options. So far, I kinda like the way YoutubeDL-Material looks. If you're using an unRaid server, there's even a docker app you can run without configuring anything.

I'm using this one through docker, but it's a little flakey.

I've had a look at youtubedl-material, and it hasn't been updated for a while. is there anything else? Can someone confirm it does everything youtube-dl cli does?

I self-host an instance of YoutubeDL-Material and it works great most of the time. Nice frontend UI for youtube-dl.

I've been using https://github.com/Tzahi12345/YoutubeDL-Material. Seems to work pretty well.