mediabox VS arch-delugevpn

I'd love to see what you have done on your own / changed / improved after taking a look into Mediabox

I already have my own project that does the same thing - Mediabox - https://github.com/tom472/mediabox

Basically, I would like that few of my containers to use a proxy whenever they need to access the external world (e.g. Sonarr and its friends). At the moment, for Deluge I am using binhex docker image, an all in one solution for torrent, vpn and so on. Just to add an extra security layer, I would like to obfuscate from my ISP all the calls that the *Arr friends are doing to the usual search engines.

Solution in the end was to just find a pre-created docker image that handled both I used https://github.com/binhex/arch-delugevpn but there seem to be qbittorrent equivalents out there.

Check it out, read the full page and have another go: https://github.com/binhex/arch-delugevpn

https://github.com/binhex/arch-qbittorrentvpn https://github.com/binhex/arch-delugevpn

Vpn killswitch Torrent clients: rutorrent deluge qbittorrent

Are you wanting to use your VPN for anything other than your torrent traffic? If not, an easier method might just be to grab an container that has VPN+torrent client in one. Like this: https://github.com/binhex/arch-delugevpn

Is arch-delugevpn still a popular route to go? Would like to use deluge or qbittorrent if possible.

DSM 7.1.1-42962 Update 3 was auto-installed on my DS220+ last night and today I can't access the web UI for binhex arch-delugevpn.

Seeing how the latest docker image arch-delugevpn doesn't work in DSM 7 (Kernel Too Old Message), what is the last known working version of Arch-Delugevpn that does work in DSM 7?