matter-js VS engine

Do you think this worked so cleanly because there is a tutorial similar to this and its in the dataset?

https://github.com/liabru/matter-js/wiki/Tutorials

If you don't want to create your own physics engine, there are also existing ones like matter.js.

A physics engine for the basic stuff (colisions with the terrain, gravity, rigid body mechanics, suspension springs...) would be great and I think Matter.js it's a great option

Another option is to add a third-party physics library such as Matter.js, although setting up and integrating the physics library can be tricky. If you need physics in your game, especially more complex physics effects, Phaser is a better choice.

I have created a demonstration for liquid (or gooey) effect on HTML Canvas using Matter.js and SVG Filters.

I recently came across this library: https://github.com/liabru/matter-js

This was a bold faced lie. Matter.js has no continuous collision detection. You wasted so much of my time I hope you are mildly inconvenienced in the near future! https://github.com/liabru/matter-js/issues/5

https://github.com/liabru/matter-js/issues/243 was a bit confusing. The solutions in this thread don't seem to work for me, and i cant find any information elsewhere.

Over half of the source code is just making the robots exist. If you haven't used matter.js before, you can download it here. You can read the whole documentation here, but the functions we will need are:

10 × PlayCanvas Personal plan for 12 months

For some reason that I cannot understand in my case the calculated shading normals are pixelated. Compared to playcanvas.com (probably a forward renderer), mine is like utter shit.

PlayCanvas has been using WordPress for 12 years now. Generally speaking, it's been fine. However, after much consideration, we have migrated away to Jekyll + GitHub Pages. I thought our experience might be of interest to other WordPress users (if only to confirm why you wouldn't consider switching): https://blog.playcanvas.com/moving-from-wordpress-to-jekyll-a-case-study/ Interested to hear peoples' thoughts...

It's just a cool tech demo that pushes CSS to its limits, but it's completely useless if you want to create usable 3d models. If you want to model in the browser, you can check out vectary, playcanvas, or spline

Hey, I do not have any experience with deepar.ai so I’m not super familiar with the process using that platform. In my opinion I’d probably recommend another platform to try and accomplish this. Since you mentioned that you have everything set up in a engine already (lens studio) I’d recommend you just use a webxr engine. In my experience the two best engines are https://playcanvas.com and https://wonderlandengine.com. I think that going down this route may be the best option for your needs. I am willing to help out or do some of the work for you just pm me if you have any questions or anything.

If you want the closest thing to Unity that's focused on browser-based (mobile and otherwise) development, try Playcanvas: https://playcanvas.com/

Release Notes: https://github.com/playcanvas/engine/releases/tag/v1.62.0 Clustered Arealights Demo: https://playcanvas.com/demos/arealights/