masscan
bettercap
Our great sponsors
masscan | bettercap | |
---|---|---|
64 | 28 | |
22,564 | 15,655 | |
- | 1.4% | |
7.8 | 1.0 | |
about 1 month ago | 11 days ago | |
C | Go | |
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
masscan
- Why so many bots?
-
Mass Scanning
Can I get banned for mass scanning with https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan or does it slow down any other vms from other persons?
-
Has anyone ever had their homelab or network hacked? What happened?
Nope, this doesn't work any more. Shodan checks all ports (so any attackers using data from Shodan already know which ports you have open), and tools like masscan (https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan) let you portscan the entire IPv4 address space in less than 10 minutes.
-
Private server intruded
https://github.com/LogoiLab/mcsl https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan
-
My home server is frustrating me. Please help me, home server wizards.
Changing the default port does nothing for security. It only prevents some basic brute force or default password scripts. Anyone is able to scan for it in no time anyway (https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan).
-
Should I be Concerned?
But it should blow away the far-too-common belief that no-one's after you because you're not interesting enough. IPv4 is smaller than we think. It is not difficult to scan the entire ipv4 space in minutes. And every single one of those is going to knock your door on the way past.
-
Ask HN: Looking for an Old Article
I'm not sure about the article, but the blazingly-fast IP scanner sounds a lot like Masscan. It can scan the entire Internet in 5 minutes and has received a lot of press: https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan . https://rushter.com/blog/how-masscan-works/ is one of many articles about it.
-
Is my Synology getting port-scanned?
Here's an except from the masscan docs:
- I was hit with ransomware in my Plex server and I'm not sure where it came from. Could a DMZ be the cause?
- PSA: Masscan has changed his IP. Please block the new one on your firewall! Its likely our vps reporting worked.
bettercap
-
bettercap VS petep - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 3 Oct 2023
-
Malware installed in this bluetooth remote?
you can do this with Bettercap
- bettercap hell
-
quicklisp security (or total lack of it)
I've been learning some common lisp, reading through Practical Common Lisp, and it's really neat. People say the good ideas of lisp got adapted in other languages and sure that's true of garbage collection, lambda's and some others, but I'm seeing plenty incredible stuff I haven't seen elsewhere, the condition system that among other things lets you fix and resume your program on exception, real interactive development, flexible object system, macros way more understandable than in other languages with AST macros as in lisp the AST is simple, an expressive dynamic language at high level of ruby and python while being an order of magnitude faster performance. Quicklisp also is really neat, how many other package managers can load new dependencies without restarting your application? And I was learning it with idea that it's not just of historical or hobby interest but legitimately a good choice I can use for new programming projects today for many tasks, but I just learned something that makes it impossible for me to consider, which is complete lack of security of quicklisp. You go to the website and see sha256 hash and PGP signature for quicklisp download, awesome it seems at the security standard you expect for a package manager. But then the actual quicklisp client does all downloads over http with no verification. What this means in practical terms is basically if you use quicklisp, anyone on your local network can easily hack your computer, by MITM (man-in-the-middle) the traffic and serving you backdoored software when you install packages from quicklisp. mitm6 will MITM windows machines on normal networks, bettercap can MITM linux and os x on most networks. Aside from attackers on your local network there's plenty other scenarios, you can go near office of CL using company and set up a open WIFI access point with same name as company wifi and hack their developers, using quicklisp over something like Tor is extremely dangerous at present as it would let the exit node backdoor the packages you download, and then in less likely but still should be protected against scenarios is just if quicklisp.org or any router between you and it is compromised, you can be hacked.
- Grannar från helvetet
- Bettercap – Swiss Army Knife for 802.11, BLE, IPv4 and IPv6 Networks
-
Hacker News top posts: Dec 3, 2022
Bettercap – Swiss Army Knife for 802.11, BLE, IPv4 and IPv6 Networks\ (5 comments)
What are some alternatives?
RustScan - 🤖 The Modern Port Scanner 🤖
aircrack-ng - WiFi security auditing tools suite
zmap - ZMap is a fast single packet network scanner designed for Internet-wide network surveys.
MITMf - Framework for Man-In-The-Middle attacks
amass - In-depth attack surface mapping and asset discovery
mitmproxy - An interactive TLS-capable intercepting HTTP proxy for penetration testers and software developers.
nuclei - Fast and customizable vulnerability scanner based on simple YAML based DSL.
wifipumpkin3 - Powerful framework for rogue access point attack.
zgrab2-configurations - A repository for possible zgrab2 configurations
pwnagotchi-display-password-plugin - Pwnagotchi plugin to display the most recently cracked password on the Pwnagotchi face
SQLMap - Automatic SQL injection and database takeover tool
Metasploit - Metasploit Framework