marten VS lucky

The Marten web framework incorporates an intuitive object-relational mapper (ORM), streamlining the development process for users who may not possess extensive knowledge of databases and SQL. To facilitate interactions with collections of model records, Marten introduces a dynamic mechanism called "Query sets". A query set represents a collection of model records in the database. It can have filters, be paginated, sliced, etc. In this guide, we will cover how to leverage such querying capabilities.

Check out the Marten GitHub repository

Marten is a web framework written in Crystal that makes building web applications easy and enjoyable. Mosquito is a background task runner for Crystal that uses Redis and that makes it easy to schedule and run tasks asynchronously.

Marten is a Crystal web framework that makes building web applications easy, productive, and fun. The 0.2 release adds key features to the framework such as authentication, email sending, raw SQL query capabilities, ... You can check out the full changelog for an overview of all the new features and changes that are part of this release.

Lucky is a full-stack framework written in the Crystal programming language. One of the neat benefits of using Lucky with Crystal is the typesafety you get.

https://luckyframework.org/ . Kemal is even faster but it's mostly for APIs. In my opinion it's on par with Actix with much, much better developer experience.

I'd love to see two docs there:

- What's different from Lucky https://luckyframework.org/

- What's different from Amber https://amberframework.org/

> Regarding 1. While this is certainly an issue, it’s an issue for anyone using any framework and a challenge of database-backed web applications everywhere.

No, there are frameworks out there that doesn't allow queries during template rendering. See Lucky for an example, https://luckyframework.org/.

Lucky: https://luckyframework.org/