marko
Elm
Our great sponsors
marko | Elm | |
---|---|---|
40 | 198 | |
13,079 | 7,434 | |
0.6% | 0.7% | |
9.5 | 5.4 | |
7 days ago | 15 days ago | |
JavaScript | Haskell | |
MIT License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
marko
-
The Best UI Libraries for Cross-Platform Apps with Tauri
SolidJS and Tauri form another potent combination for creating performant, lightweight, and secure experiences. SolidJS is a reactive UI library that is similar to Svelte in the way it compiles away reactivity and updates the DOM directly, but it also incorporates a fine-grained reactivity system reminiscent of libraries like Marko, Knockout, and MobX.
- Mudanças na DevPT
- FLiP Stack Weekly for 06 February 2023
- Marko: An HTML-Based Language
-
The Qase for Qwik: Love At First TTI
Marko is a huge leap in the right direction. It has streaming, partial hydration, a compiler that optimizes your output, and a small runtime. I’ve also heard through the grapevine that Marko V6 also adds resumability to the framework as well.
-
Movies app in 7 frameworks - which is fastest and why?
Nevertheless, the future of JS frameworks is exciting. As we’ve seen from the data, Astro is doing some things right alongside Qwik. However, more noteworthy frameworks such as Marko and Solid are also paving the path forward with some similar traits and better performance benchmarks. We’ve come back full circle in web development - from PHP/Rails to SPAs and now back to SSR. Maybe we just need to break the cycle.
-
Repeating Navigation, Header, and Footer in CSS and HTML?
If you want more, take a look on Marko, fresh, qwik or pug. Dind't tested yet but they look like same as Nunjucks.
-
Client-side Routing without the JavaScript
And that is a similar feeling to the exploration we've been doing recently. Inspired equal parts from React Server Components and Island solutions like Marko and Astro, Solid has made it's first steps into Partial Hydration.
-
Astro 1.0
I haven’t done any serious work with either, but I’ve been following both closely (and have contributed a bit to Astro early on). So this isn’t the hands-on response you specifically asked for, and may not contain new information to you. I’m posting anyway in case it adds context for others.
Qwik City[1] is probably more directly analogous to Astro, Qwik being more analogous to Astro’s integrated renderers. But that highlights one of the key differences.
Astro’s compiler mostly focuses on server rendering of static content (.astro templates, MDX) and bundling client resources along with the logic necessary to hydrate islands. Astro defers to those renderers (and in some cases their own compilers) for any further optimization of the client bundle.
Qwik’s compiler optimizes the component code directly, serializing state into the HTML it renders server-side, for the client bundle to resume from that state. Its output is conceptually similar to Phoenix LiveView (which was mentioned in another sub-thread).
Both are compelling approaches. I think Qwik’s will probably (eventually) have an optimization advantage because that’s a core focus of the client library. Astro will likely have an adoption advantage because it’s client-library-agnostic.
Another framework in the space often gets passed over: Marko[2], which has been doing partial hydration for years at eBay. Marko is probably more similar in approach to Qwik (and as I understand it, getting more similar as they’re going resumable too), but like Astro has its own templating language which enables its compiler optimizations.
Also worth watching SolidJS[3] (whose creator has also worked on Marko), which is tracking partial hydration/resumability on its roadmap. I’m not sure what their approach will look like but there’s quite a lot of insight both in the issue and the creator’s tweets/replies on the topic.
Personally I think there’s a gap between all of these approaches which could leverage type-level analysis to go much further. But that isn’t really feasible when types being available or accurate isn’t a safe assumption.
-
Syntax highlighting library support for modern frontend frameworks
There is no support for newer frameworks like Marko, which have their own file extension (format).
Elm
-
Ludic: New framework for Python with seamless Htmx support
Elm [1] is based on a similar idea. Build your app from pure functions that return HTML tags.
-
Learning Elm by porting a medium-sized web front end from React (2019)
elm is a lovely lang. it would be nice to have modern APIs on it.
here's the project for new eyes:
-
Can you make your own JavaScript by implementing ECMAScript standard?
You also wouldn't really be creating your own new programing language. You would be creating something that can run JavaScript by following JavaScript standards and syntax. You might be able to add some non-standard features of your own on top of those standards, or include your own standard library of helpers or utilities, but you can't completely make a new or alternative language and then load it in the browser (or at least not by reimplementing ECMAScript standards... you actually can make your own language that runs within any Javascript enviroment, if you provide an interpreter or compiler that transforms it into valid JS. Some people have done something like this, eg Elm: https://elm-lang.org/).
- Course using F#: Write your own tiny programming system(s)
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
I get it. However, the whole point of using Unions to narrow your types, ensure only a set of possible scenarios can occur, and only access data of a particular union when it’s safe to do so. That’s some of what pattern matching can provide, and 100% of what using switch statements in TypeScript with their Discriminated Unions can provide. Yes, it’s not 100% exhaustive, but TypeScript is not soundly typed, and even Elm which is still has the same issue TypeScript does: You’re running in JavaScript where anything is possible. So it’s good enough to build with and much better than what you had.
-
How to render a basic calendar UI in Elm
The beauty of a language like Elm (and other lambda-calculus / functional programming inspired languages) is that there's very little transformation involved in going from an idea to code. And that seems to have a big impact on getting things done.
- Como desenvolvi um backend web em Clojure
-
Is it possible to write games like Pac-Man in a functional language?
I think the most fun and approachable way for beginners to build games with functional programming is with Elm [1].
See a few (small, demo) games built by the community in [2] .
Notice Elm has abandoned the FRP approach in favor of Model-View-Update [3].
- Qual a linguagem que vocês mais gostam de programar?
What are some alternatives?
astro - The web framework for content-driven websites. ⭐️ Star to support our work!
Jade - Pug – robust, elegant, feature rich template engine for Node.js
EJS - Embedded JavaScript templates -- http://ejs.co
handlebars.js - Minimal templating on steroids.
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
solid - A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces. [Moved to: https://github.com/solidui/solid]
nunjucks - A powerful templating engine with inheritance, asynchronous control, and more (jinja2 inspired)
qwik - Instant-loading web apps, without effort
haskelm - Haskell to Elm translation using Template Haskell. Contains both a library and executable.
purescript - A strongly-typed language that compiles to JavaScript
doT - The fastest + concise javascript template engine for nodejs and browsers. Partials, custom delimiters and more.
yew - Rust / Wasm framework for creating reliable and efficient web applications