sycamore VS solid

Perseus is a fast frontend web development framework for Rust with built-in support for reactivity using Sycamore, server-side rendering, and much more. Sycamore is a frontend library that allows you to build interactive user interfaces with Rust. I’d say that Perseus is to Sycamore as Next.js is to React, so it’ll be helpful for you to have a fair understanding of Sycamore before jumping into using Perseus — although it’s not necessary to follow along in this article.

Now, I considered whether to spend more time fixing everything that now failed in sycamore 0.9. But there are major changes ahead which would require yet another major refactoring, to the point where I am not sure whether it would not be more of a rewrite than a refactoring, given my previous experiences with sycamore.

Sycamore.

Sycamore, Yew, or Seed if you want a full-stack solution. (Or Leptos if you want something that's faster but less mature.)

There are others, like Sycamore, similar story as Leptos but imo Leptos is (currently) more ergonomic.

I tried my first project with yew as frontend. And my experience was after some time similar to the already mentioned ones: It is a little more to take on than I actually wanted. And some things were not straightforward to achieve. I switched to sycamore for the other projects now and I am much more satisfied (but this could also be since I have some more experience in the Rust ecosystem by now). Changing from yew to sycamore was pretty easy and I can achieve most of the tasks with less code.

If you want to do fullstack/SPA stuff, check out Sycamore, Seed, and Yew.

If you want to do front-end SPA development, take a look at Yew, Seed, or Sycamore.

I have written a front-end (website) application in Rust that is used internally in production. I wouldn't recommend to use something like sycamore, leptos, dioxus, yew for you next puplic web-app now but i can absolutely see how this is used in the future as those libs mature.

There are several performant rust web frameworks: Sycamore - Uses an architecture like solidjs Leptos - Uses an architecture like solidjs Dioxus - Uses an architecture like react

The reactivity core, which is in https://github.com/solidjs/solid This is where you'll see the reactivity runtime implementation. Take note that Solid's reactivity doesn't rely on compile-time magic

This is very true. I really hate svelte single file components. But then I tried JSX for breaking things down. I love solid but I don't feel really good about angle brackets within C style syntax. I saw this Scala library that stick with simple statically typed function syntax than html tags. I don't understand why people still wants to stick with xml like tags. In laminar markup is written like this scala div( h1("Hello world", color := "red"), inputCaption, input(inputMods, name := "fullName"), div( ">>", button("Submit"), "<<" ) ) I wish solid team makes their HyperScript syntax as performant as JSX.

What is Solid?

import logo from './logo.svg'; import styles from './App.module.css'; import 'flowbite'; function App() { return (

Edit src/App.jsx and save to reload.

Learn Solid, Tailwind CSS and Flowbite Toggle Flowbite modal

Terms of Service

svg> Close modal

With less than a month to go before the European Union enacts new consumer privacy laws for its citizens, companies around the world are updating their terms of service agreements to comply.

The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (G.D.P.R.) goes into effect on May 25 and is meant to ensure a common set of data rights in the European Union. It requires organizations to notify users as soon as possible of high-risk data breaches that could personally affect them.

I accept Decline

); } export default App;

There is example of each technique in Solid's main repo: https://github.com/solidjs/solid/tree/main/packages/solid-ssr/examples

Current reactivity benchmarks (Solid, CellX, Maverick) are focused on creation time, and update time for a static graph. Additionally, existing benchmarks aren't very configurable, and don't test for dynamic dependencies.

Before diving into SolidStart, it's worth taking a moment to outline the history and motivation behind the creation of Solid. Branded as "a reactive JavaScript library for building user interfaces," Ryan open sourced the framework on April 24, 2018. It was designed as a spiritual successor to the reactive programming model exemplified by KnockoutJS.

As always, less complexity and less expressive power at a given level go hand in hand: as far as I could understand, Deno as it exists right now can’t work with a relatively tame nonstandard approach to JSX such as that in Solid.js[1] (without essentially running a build step at startup), let alone a full language extension like Svelte[2] (there is a thing for that now[3], but I think it still squeezes in a build system somehow).

[1] https://github.com/solidjs/solid/discussions/332

[2] https://github.com/sveltejs/svelte/issues/4431

[3] https://github.com/crewdevio/Snel

This one hit late so I put it in July - SolidJS releases version 1.0.0. Never heard of it checkout the perf chart Ryan Carniato wroteup.