lua-patterns VS groq-test-suite

Compare lua-patterns vs groq-test-suite and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
lua-patterns groq-test-suite
1 1
27 10
- -
0.0 5.0
over 1 year ago 24 days ago
Rust JavaScript
MIT License -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

lua-patterns

Posts with mentions or reviews of lua-patterns. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-03.
  • The Norway Problem
    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Apr 2021
    If you want automatic built-in string validation, one option that seems particularly interesting is to use a variant of Lua patterns, which are weaker and easier to understand than regular expressions, but still provide a significant degree of "sanity" for something like an email. The original version works on bytes and not runes, but you could simply write a parser that works on runes instead, and the pattern-matching code is just 400 old and battle-tested lines of C89.

    Lua patterns have also shown up in other places, such as BSD's httpd, and an implementation for Rust:

    https://www.gsp.com/cgi-bin/man.cgi?section=7&topic=PATTERNS

    https://github.com/stevedonovan/lua-patterns

    http://lua-users.org/wiki/PatternsTutorial

groq-test-suite

Posts with mentions or reviews of groq-test-suite. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-03.
  • The Norway Problem
    18 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 3 Apr 2021
    TOML also has a few restrictions, such as not supporting mixed-type arrays like [1, "hello", true], or arrays at the root of the data. JSON can represent any TOML value (as far as I know), but TOML cannot represent any JSON value.

    At my company we use YAML a lot for table-driven tests (e.g. [1]), and this not only means lots of nested arrays, but also having to represent pure data (i.e. the expected output of a test), which requires a format that supports encoding arbitrary data structures.

    [1] https://github.com/sanity-io/groq-test-suite/

What are some alternatives?

When comparing lua-patterns and groq-test-suite you can also consider the following projects:

jsonnet - Jsonnet - The data templating language

yamllint - A linter for YAML files.

dhall-lang - Maintainable configuration files

tao-data-js - TAO data JavaScript module

edn - Extensible Data Notation

strictyaml - Type-safe YAML parser and validator.

cson - CoffeeScript-Object-Notation. Same as JSON but for CoffeeScript objects.

toml.io - Source Code for toml.io

tao-data-csharp - C# TAO data library

pyyaml - Canonical source repository for PyYAML

awesome-json-next - A Collection of What's Next for Awesome JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) for Structured (Meta) Data in Text - JSON5, HJSON, HanSON, TJSON, SON, CSON, USON, JSONX/JSON11 & Many More