stable-diffusion VS stable_diffusion.openvino

Yes, you can install it with Python! https://github.com/lstein/stable-diffusion works with macOS, and you can control all the common parameter via their WebUI or CLI :)

I'm using lstein fork ("dream") and when I create an image from the terminal, it also writes back to the terminal like this:

> Whenever I ask for something like ‘seamless tiling xxxxxx’ it kinda sorta gets the idea, but the resulting texture doesn’t quite tile right.

Getting seamless tiling requires more than just have "seamless tiling" in the prompt. It also depends on if the fork you're using has that feature at all.

https://github.com/lstein/stable-diffusion has the feature, but you need to pass it outside the prompt. So if you use the `dream.py` prompt cli, you can pass it `"Hats on the ground" --seamless` and it should be perfectly tilable.

From https://github.com/lstein/stable-diffusion

Stable Diffusion Dream Script: This is the original site/script for supporting macOS. I found this soon after Stable Diffusion was publicly released and it was the site which inspired me to try out using Stable Diffusion on a mac. They have a web-based UI (as well as command-line scripts) and a lot of documentation on how to get things working.

I’m pretty sure it works for M2 as well - basically the newer ARM-based Macs. The instructions to get it working are detailed! https://github.com/lstein/stable-diffusion

it might be the --xformers flag, try getting rid of that since your not using cuda you wouldn't be able to run it with xformers and you could also try --use-cpu all ... you can also check this out .. https://github.com/bes-dev/stable_diffusion.openvino .. it's probably your best option if your using CPU, which if your PC Graphics are using Intel UHD 620 then you don't have a GPU and an optimized CPU inference would be best to run

SD can be run on a CPU without a GPU. I know for certain it can be done with OpenVINO. In fact, on some i7s, it will run at around 3 seconds per iteration. There was a reddit SD thread a while back saying it can be done with Automatic111. Also, soe recent threads on problems with AMD GPUs suggest Automatic1111 is using the CPU rather than the intended GPU. (Fortuanely, I have a GPU, so I don't have to deal with it myself!)

I'm not actually entirely convinced that it's even using the GPU. Radeontop shows 0% utilization while the images are generating. Additionally, the listed iteration speed should be impossibly slow for any GPU; it says 26.58s/it, which is slower than just running on a CPU.

iGPU's are in short not supported. There's this repo that may or may not help you, but even if it did I wouldn't expect much.

You can also run it in windows native with openvino, there is a barebones webui for it as well in one of the forks.Requires setting cpu to gpu in one the files. https://github.com/bes-dev/stable_diffusion.openvino

In https://github.com/bes-dev/stable_diffusion.openvino/blob/master/stable_diffusion_engine.py

" We ended up using three different Stable Diffusion projects for our testing, mostly because no single package worked on every GPU. For Nvidia, we opted for Automatic 1111's webui version(opens in new tab). AMD GPUs were tested using Nod.ai's Shark version(opens in new tab), while for Intel's Arc GPUs we used Stable Diffusion OpenVINO(opens in new tab). "