loki VS charts

I also needed to make a small patch to Promtail to make this work: https://github.com/grafana/loki/pull/10256

We don't pull logs, we forward logs to a centralized logging service.

Over the past few months, I've been spending a lot of time creating dashboards on Grafana using Loki for MyUnisoft (the company I work for).

For log systems you generally don't migrate data. Logs lose value over time. What you want to do is to go ahead and start ingesting data into the new system (OpenObserve in this case) and slowly, the data in the old system will become stale and then you can retire it. However if you need to export logs anyhow, there is no straightforward way in loki to do this. You could run a script to query loki and export it to a file. If found this thread with a sample script - https://github.com/grafana/loki/issues/409

That snap is woefully out of date. The upstream repo was recently updated to 2.8.2, but the snap stable channel has 2.4.1 from 18 months ago. https://github.com/grafana/loki/releases/tag/v2.8.2

Loki

I installed promtail a few weeks back and I ran into this bug, that has been outstanding for months: https://github.com/grafana/loki/issues/8663 (e.g. a fix had been written but had not been released):

Due to a buffering issue, Loki would exit in case of configuration error without printing any error message or anything at all

There is definitely something weird about how the project is run.

Both of these examples seem pretty obvious and something you wouldn’t mess up, but as your chart grows, so does your values.yaml file. A great example is the Redis chart by Bitnami. I encourage you to scroll through its values file. See you in a minute!

We will write a Terraform module that will take a list of configurations for each required RabbitMQ instance. Luckily for us, we don't have to write the Kubernetes yaml configurations since the helm charts by Bitnami does a great job of doing all the things we discussed above. All we need to do is leverage Terraform Helm Provider and deploy the chart with the required values for our use case.

💡  The full details of helm charts can be referenced in their associated GitHub Repository.

I have a configmap with the ndjson set up under data:, similar to https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/6159 and it's subsequent answer.

This way, you can easily deploy any Helm charts from this public repo - https://github.com/bitnami/charts/tree/main/bitnami in just minutes.

The Bitnami Github Pages themselves usually cover everything you need to know. Configure a values.yaml file, or modify that to your liking, and you run helm install, as written in their docs.

The actual reason that our pods are not coming up is found when we review the helm installation that we are trying to run. If you check the dependencies in the GitHub repository (https://github.com/bitnami/charts/blob/main/bitnami/drupal/values.yaml) you find out that persistent storage is enabled by default and set to 8Gi. Also, the helm package uses MariaDB and the database size is specified to a default of 8Gi, thus setting the minimum storage for this installation to be 16Gi.

We're using https://github.com/bitnami/charts/tree/main/bitnami/spark, but I have heard good things about https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/spark-on-k8s-operator as well. Hudi should not need any long running deployments as per the docs https://hudi.apache.org/docs/0.5.1/deployment/#deploying

Bitnami has its own scaffolding published at https://github.com/bitnami/charts/tree/main/template