sunshine VS parsec

EDIT: Just checked again, original was released early 2020, current maintained project started 2022.

This was made with a Switch + Capture Card and a combination of my moonlight-wiiu port, sunshine and nxbt.

There's an alternative to Moonlight called Sunshine you could try.

Im assuming that this project is just a fork of the original sunshine project ( https://github.com/loki-47-6F-64/sunshine ) for the sake of maintaining and updating it and continued development. It looks like the docs page for this new fork is more thorough, but the Readme thats shown on Github should probably have more immediate directions for installation and the things needed for the gamepad support. The less clicks people need to go through to get things set up and running, the better the experience for everyone its gonna be.

For anyone that wants to still use/run Moonlight after this is shut off, there is an open source gamestream server called sunshine that should realistically still work. I used this previously with an AMD 5700XT, and never had any issues with it, and it performs significantly better then the Steam Link app did.

I think this is the official one https://github.com/loki-47-6F-64/sunshine

I'm guessing you're trying to stream via steam link? You could try other remote desktop tools such as parsec or sunshine & moonlight.

If you don't have an Nvidia GPU (or have monitor numbering issues) you can run https://github.com/loki-47-6F-64/sunshine as the server on your PC instead of relying on GeForce Experience.

There is an open source project called Sunshine that lets you stream to Moonlight clients from any GPU https://github.com/loki-47-6F-64/sunshine

Writing Haskell programs that rely on third-party packages is still an issue when it’s a not actively maintained package. They get out of date with the base library (Haskell’s standard library), and you might see yourself in a situation where you need to downgrade to an older version. This is not exclusive to Haskell, but it happens more often than I’d like to assume. However, if you only rely on known well-maintained libraries/frameworks such as Aeson, Squeleto, Yesod, and Parsec, to name a few, it’s unlikely you will face troubles at all, you just need to be more mindful of what you add as a dependency. There’s stackage.org now, a repository that works with Stack, providing a set of packages that are proven to work well together and help us to have reproducible builds in a more manageable way—not the solution for all the cases but it’s good to have it as an option.

The Parsec library for Haskell uses combinators, and there are a few good resources around the internet which explore it, if you know Haskell.

Konbini is a functional parser combinator library inspired by Haskell parsing libraries like Parsec. It's (hopefully) fairly easy to use, and is about as performant as the better-parse library. In fact, it's quite similar to better-parse in many aspects. The main difference is in how parsers are composed. Where better-parse prefers operators and infix functions, Konbini instead uses plain functions.

good libraries for parsing: parsec, attoparsec etc.

Thank you! When I read the title I only knew about https://hackage.haskell.org/package/parsec, and for a moment I was very confused…

The more "idiomatic" way would be to use a parser library, e.g. parsec, attoparsec, or megaparsec. But even then I think it would be a lot easier to maintain if you could preserve the angle brackets <> in the input.

Not to be confused with Haskell's parsec https://hackage.haskell.org/package/parsec

I wish it were more common or accepted to use parser combinator libraries in place of Regex. Libraries like Parsec are basically this but integrate into the target language and can be used to atomize and combine parse expressions and therefore be written in a much more readable way.