livebook
bakeware
Our great sponsors
livebook | bakeware | |
---|---|---|
79 | 9 | |
4,390 | 1,397 | |
3.1% | 0.0% | |
9.8 | 1.8 | |
1 day ago | almost 2 years ago | |
Elixir | C | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
livebook
- Arraymancer – Deep Learning Nim Library
-
Setup Nx lib and EXLA to run NX/AXON with CUDA
LiveBook site
-
Interactive Code Cells
I prefer functional programming with Livebook[1] for this type of thing. Once you run a cell, it can be published right into a web component as well.
[1] - https://livebook.dev
-
What software should I use as an alternative to Microsoft OneNote?
If you're a coder, Livebook might be worth a look too. I certainly have my eyes on it.
-
Advent of Code Day 5
Would highly recommend looking at Jose's use of livebook to answer these. It makes testing easier. It's old but still relevant. Video link inside
- Advent of Code 2023 is nigh
-
Racket branch of Chez Scheme merging with mainline Chez Scheme
That's hard to say. Racket is a rather complete language, as is F# and Elixir. And F# and Racket are extremely capable multi-paradigm languages, supporting basically any paradigm. Elixir is a bit more restricted in terms of its paradigms, but that's a feature oftentimes, and it also makes up for it with its process framework and deep VM support from the BEAM.
I would say that the key difference is that F# and Elixir are backed by industry whereas Racket is primarily backed via academia. Thus, the incentives and goals are more aligned for F# and Elixir to be used in industrial settings.
Also, both F# and Elixir gain a lot from their host VMs in the CLR and BEAM. Overall, F# is the cleanest language of the three, as it is easy to write concise imperative, functional, or OOP code and has easy asynchronous facilities. Elixir supports macros, and although Racket's macro system is far more advanced, I don't think it really provides any measurable utility over Elixir's. I would also say that F# and Elixir's documentation is better than Racket's. Racket has a lot of documentation, but it can be a little terse at times. And Elixir definitely has the most active, vibrant, and complete ecosystem of all three languages, as well as job market.
The last thing is that F# and Elixir have extremely good notebook implementations in Polyglot Notebooks (https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-dotne...) and Livebook (https://livebook.dev/), respectively. I would say both of these exceed the standard Python Jupyter notebook, and Racket doesn't have anything like Polyglot Notebooks or Livebook. (As an aside, it's possible for someone to implement a Racket kernel for Polyglot Notebooks, so maybe that's a good side project for me.)
So for me, over time, it has slowly whittled down to F# and Elixir being my two languages that I reach for to handle effectively any project. Racket just doesn't pull me in that direction, and I would say that Racket is a bit too locked to DrRacket. I tried doing some GUI stuff in Racket, and despite it having an already built framework, I have actually found it easier to write my own due to bugs found and the poor performance of Racket Draw.
-
Runme – Interactive Runbooks Built with Markdown
This looks very similar to LiveBook¹. It is purely Elixir/BEAM based, but is quite polished and seems like a perfect workflow tool that is also able to expose these workflows (simply called livebooks) as web apps that some functional, non-technical person can execute on his/her own.
- Livebook: Automate code and data workflows with interactive notebooks
- Elixir Livebook is a secret weapon for documentation
bakeware
-
Programming language for high performance simulations. Is there anything like this already?
I've not used either of them myself, but I think they fit some of your requirements (simple programs, efficient, events, no memory management). There seem to be libraries for constraint programming. It does run on a VM with a GC though. And while programs can be compiled to binaries, they're not tiny.
-
New Elixir 1.12 – The developer’s point of view
There’s a couple of approaches to this problem going on:
1. Bakeware “bakes” your application together with the entire Erlang/OTP/Beam/Elixir stack into a single binary. Given the “batteries included” philosophy of OTP, these binaries end up being fairly large, but it works: https://github.com/bake-bake-bake/bakeware
2. Lumen compiles Elixir, Erlang and friends into WASM. This will in time enable small fast cross-platform static binaries, but it is not done yet: https://getlumen.org/
- Bakeware: Compile any Elixir application into a single binary
- Compile Elixir applications into single, easily distributed executable binaries
- Bakeware: Compile Elixir applications into single binaries
-
Livebook: A collaborative and interactive code notebook for Elixir
That one is out of date, the one it forked of is not: https://github.com/bake-bake-bake/bakeware
-
Why I don't understand criticism of FP's speed for list transformations
I've read that the Javascript runtime Deno is able to compile to a static binary and has a standard lib that is practically a port of Gos standard library....i feel the static binary deal is quite a game changer today given its portability in devops ....Elixir is able to compile to static binaries as well with bakeware 😊https://github.com/bake-bake-bake/bakeware
-
Elixir Nx. What Do We Know About This Mysterious Project?
It's already possible with https://github.com/bake-bake-bake/bakeware ✌️😊
What are some alternatives?
kino - Client-driven interactive widgets for Livebook
terra - Terra is a low-level system programming language that is embedded in and meta-programmed by the Lua programming language.
awesome-advent-of-code - A collection of awesome resources related to the yearly Advent of Code challenge.
AtomVM - Tiny Erlang VM
interactive - .NET Interactive combines the power of .NET with many other languages to create notebooks, REPLs, and embedded coding experiences. Share code, explore data, write, and learn across your apps in ways you couldn't before.
efuse_filter - Erlang NIF for Binary Fuse Filter. Fast and Smaller Than Xor Filters.
Genie.jl - 🧞The highly productive Julia web framework
bakeware - Compile Elixir applications into single, easily distributed executable binaries. Spawnfest 2020 project winner :trophy:
Elixir - Elixir is a dynamic, functional language for building scalable and maintainable applications
c-semantics - Semantics of C in K
axon - Nx-powered Neural Networks
mate3s-influx-reporter - An InfluxDB reporting system for Outback Power's Mate3s.