lit
pomsky
Our great sponsors
lit | pomsky | |
---|---|---|
141 | 19 | |
17,489 | 1,258 | |
1.8% | 0.1% | |
9.4 | 8.4 | |
3 days ago | 3 months ago | |
TypeScript | Rust | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
lit
-
I've created yet another JavaScript framework
That is the reason why I experiment with the TiniJS framework for a while. It is a collection of tools for developing web/desktop/mobile apps using the native Web Component technology, based on the Lit library. Thank you the Lit team for creating a great tool assists us working with standard Web Component easier.
- Web Components e a minha opinião sobre o futuro das libs front-end
- Show HN: I made a Pinterest clone using SigLIP image embeddings
-
What We Need Instead of "Web Components"
actually, looking at it (https://lit.dev/), i do exactly that.
I also define a `render()` and extend my own parent, which does a `replaceChildren()` with the render. And, strangely, I also call the processor `html`
I'll still stick with mine however, my 'framework' is half-page of code. I dislike dependencies greatly. I'd need to be saving thousand+ lines at least.
Here, I don't want a build system to make a website; that's mad. So I don't want lit. I want the 5 lines it takes to invoke a dom parser, and the 5 lines it takes do define a webcomp parent.
-
Web Components Aren't Framework Components
I rather like https://lit.dev/ for web components so far.
For the reactivity stuff, you might want to read https://frontendmasters.com/blog/vanilla-javascript-reactivi... - it shows a bunch of no-library-required patterns that, while in a number of cases I'd much rather use a library myself, all seems at least -basically- reasonable to me and will probably be far more comprehensible to you than whatever I'd reach for, and frameworks are always much more pleasant to approach after you've already done a bunch of stuff by banging rocks together first.
- Reddit just completed their migration out of React
-
Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In
I work on Lit, which I would hesitate to call a framework, but gives a framework-like DX for building web components, while trying to keep opinions to a minimum and lock-in as low as possible.
It's got reactivity, declarative templates, great performance, SSR, TypeScript support, native CSS encapsulation, context, tasks, and more.
It's used to build Material Design, settings and devtools UIs for Chrome, some UI for Firefox, Reddit, Photoshop Web...
https://lit.dev if you're interested.
-
HTML Web Components
I am more a fan of the augmented style because it doesn't entrap you in dev lock-in to platforms.
The problem with frameworks, especially web frameworks, is they reimplement many items that are standard now (shadowdom, components, storage, templating, base libraries, class/async, network/realtime etc).
If you like the component style of other frameworks but want to use Web Components, Google Lit is quite nice.
Google Lit is like a combination of HTML Web Components and React/Vue style components. The great part is it is build on Web Components underneath.
[1] https://lit.dev/
-
Web Components Will Outlive Your JavaScript Framework
From the comments I see here, it seems like people expect the Webcomponents API to be a complete replacement for a JS framework. The thing is, our frameworks should start making use of modern web APIs, so the frameworks will have to do less themselves, so can be smaller. Lit [0] for example is doing this. Using Lit is very similar to using React. Some things work different, and you have to get used to some web component specific things, but once you get it, I think it's way more pleasant to work with than React. It feels more natural, native, less framework-specific.
For state management, I created LitState [1], a tiny library (really only 258 lines), which integrates nicely with Lit, and which makes state management between multiple components very easy. It's much easier than the Redux/flux workflows found in React.
So my experience with this is that it's much nicer to work with, and that the libraries are way smaller.
[0] https://lit.dev/
- Lit – a small responsive CSS framework
pomsky
-
How to call from Rust into JS, Java, C#, Ruby and Python?
I started with JS, and my first step was to write a simple script that checks if a regex is valid. I can call this script from Rust, but there's a problem: Starting a nodejs process takes about 100ms, which is not acceptable, especially for fuzzing.
-
How do you guard against stack overflows
I noticed this when a test case of a parser I wrote failed in CI on Windows. I then learned that the default stack size on Windows is only 1 MiB whereas its 8 MiB on Linux if I remember correctly. The parser has a hard-coded recursion limit to prevent stack overflows, which is currently set to 128. However, this limit is lower than necessary on Linux, and might still be too high for some platforms (embedded?)
-
I have to rename Rulex
I was informed that Rulex is a registered trademark and I'm not allowed to use the name for my project. A lawyer contacted me and gave me a week to rename the project, so I have to come up with a different name :(
-
Melody 0.18 (a sane alternative to regular expressions)
In the other discussion, there's also a link to Rulex, which has similar goals but is more concise. Also claims to compile to multiple regex dialects.
-
Fuzzing rust-minidump at Mozilla for Embarrassment and Crashes – Part 2
Something similar happened to me a week ago. Someone emailed me that they found panics in rulex, and then created a PR to fix them. They even explained to me how to create a security advisory on GitHub because the panics could be used to DoS someone. It was very helpful.
-
Where would you put Error enums?
Sorry for not being more specific. Since this is a parser, the span points into the text file that is being parsed, so it's not that relevant for most libraries. Here is the parser, it uses nom parser combinators. Unfortunately, and adding the spans to the errors involves some boilerplate.
-
rulex VS melody - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 19 Jun 2022
-
Any active open source repos built using Rust that need development ?
I welcome contributions for rulex. It's a medium-sized project that should be fairly easy to understand, and has some "good first issues" :)
-
Hacker News top posts: Jun 10, 2022
Rulex – A new, portable, regular expression language\ (102 comments)
- Rulex – A new, portable, regular expression language
What are some alternatives?
Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps
melody - Melody is a language that compiles to regular expressions and aims to be more readable and maintainable
stencil - A toolchain for building scalable, enterprise-ready component systems on top of TypeScript and Web Component standards. Stencil components can be distributed natively to React, Angular, Vue, and traditional web developers from a single, framework-agnostic codebase.
grex - A command-line tool and Rust library with Python bindings for generating regular expressions from user-provided test cases
Vue.js - This is the repo for Vue 2. For Vue 3, go to https://github.com/vuejs/core
regex-automata - A low level regular expression library that uses deterministic finite automata.
Angular - Deliver web apps with confidence 🚀
kleenexp - modern regular expression syntax everywhere with a painless upgrade path
htmx - </> htmx - high power tools for HTML
taffy - A high performance rust-powered UI layout library
Preact - ⚛️ Fast 3kB React alternative with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.
regex - An implementation of regular expressions for Rust. This implementation uses finite automata and guarantees linear time matching on all inputs.