linuxdeployqt
AppImageLauncher
Our great sponsors
linuxdeployqt | AppImageLauncher | |
---|---|---|
8 | 183 | |
2,104 | 4,863 | |
- | - | |
6.0 | 4.1 | |
4 months ago | about 2 months ago | |
C++ | C++ | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
linuxdeployqt
-
Two reasons because Arch-based AppImages are not a good idea
The second reason is the "modularity" of Arch, why Debian packages all the dependences in many different packages? Because a developer can isolate a bug or exclude that package using the right patch. Arch tends to package everything together. That's why an AppImage of Chromium for me is about 140 MB from a Ubuntu base and 280-300 from an Arch-base... but at least this is an issue of both arch-deployer and arch2appimage... I think that by using linuxdeployqt would be better in this case (SPOILER, it requires the host system with an old GLIBC version, also Debian Bookwork is too new for it xD ).
-
Font size is too small for the 4K monitors
Eagle uses 'linuxdeployqt' for cross-platform installations. Read about it HERE. There is a qt.conf file in the directory where the eagle executable is located. I am not sure exactly how to use it.
-
How I Create - Github Token Manager
linuxdeployqt allow to automatically pack all shared library that we need on binary file into single AppImage file, although linuxdeployqt mainly to generate AppImage for Qt application but it can use for general application, more information on https://github.com/probonopd/linuxdeployqt.
-
Help for create an installer of my app in raspberry pi 4
For raspberry on the other hand is an entirely diferent story. I tried to use this: probonopd/linuxdeployqt but with no avail. The problem is that if i download the AppImage directly from the github account i cannot use it in the raspberry because it is not compiled for raspbian or i was told. So, i tried downloading directly the source code and compile it using the Qt Creator on the raspberry but also i am encountering several problems. When i try to build qt creator gives me this error: MakeFile:65: sub-QtWebEngineApplication-qmake_all] Error 3. Also, i am receiving Unkown module(s) Qt:webengine in the Qt Creator.
-
Are you able to build a qt project into just exe?
You are looking for the windows equivalent of Mac DMG format, or linux appimage https://github.com/probonopd/linuxdeployqt/ / Flatpak.
-
https://np.reddit.com/r/QtFramework/comments/mu5cxh/qt_appimage_not_working_on_embedded_device/gv6xz02/
# Generated by linuxdeployqt # https://github.com/probonopd/linuxdeployqt/ [Paths] Prefix = ../ Plugins = plugins Imports = qml Qml2Imports = qml
- Qt AppImage not working on embedded device
-
Building an AppImage with linuxdeployqt
I am trying to use linuxdeployqt to create an appimage.
AppImageLauncher
- New to fedora, any advices?
- Flatpak Is Not the Future
-
What is the proper way to install?
Every file that you want to execute has to be in your environment PATH. I would also advise to put symlinks and personal executables in ~/.local/bin and put that to your path. Since your user has ownership over that directory, you won't have any probs with permissions that may or may not occur at all. Since we're talking about AppImage files, you might also want to take a look at AppImageLauncher which does a pretty good job at creating entries for your Desktop Menu for the AppImage files that you install to your system.
-
What’s the best way to install App Man, direct or via distrobox?
I think it's safe to install it directly as it stores everything in a single directory. For AppImages there is also AppImagePool + AppImageLauncher (can be installed rootless, useful for better integration of appimages).
- Newer Linux Administrator, have a question regarding Debian builds like Ubuntu and installer.appimage files.
- AppImage won't ask anymore to Integrate after Running only once
- AppImageLauncher no longer working on Fedora 38
-
Working on an app to "install" and manage AppImages
This reminds me of a prettier version of AppImageLauncher. Is there also an "Uninstall" option in the right-click menu of the app launcher?
-
Can I trust Flatpak apps if they are not managed by the app developer?
I'm using AppImageLauncher on Fedora.
-
Standard Notes users - how are you creating shortcut to SN inDock?
"... I recall that this was related to an issue with most Electron apps, wherein the AppImage cannot be integrated with the desktop or the favourites bar. So far we've found that the AppImageLauncher (https://github.com/TheAssassin/AppImageLauncher) helps with getting around this!
What are some alternatives?
linuxdeploy - AppDir creation and maintenance tool. Featuring flexible plugin system.
appimaged - appimaged is a daemon that monitors the system and integrates AppImages.
TIDAL-Discord-Rich-Presence-UNOFFICIAL - UNOFFICIAL Tidal Discord Rich Presence
void-packages - The Void source packages collection
AppImageUpdate - AppImageUpdate lets you update AppImages in a decentral way using information embedded in the AppImage itself.
Home Manager using Nix - Manage a user environment using Nix [maintainer=@rycee]
appimage
go-appimage - Go implementation of AppImage tools
LAN-Share - Cross platform LAN File transfer application built with Qt C++ framework
bauh - Graphical user interface for managing your Linux applications. Supports AppImage, Debian and Arch packages (including AUR), Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications
argparse - Argument Parser for Modern C++