license-list-XML
This is the repository for the master files that comprise the SPDX License List (by spdx)
bitbus
Bitcoinless Bitcoin Computing (by interplanaria)
Our great sponsors
| license-list-XML | bitbus | |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 1 | |
| 325 | 44 | |
| 4.0% | - | |
| 9.6 | 0.0 | |
| 5 days ago | over 1 year ago | |
| Makefile | JavaScript | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
license-list-XML
Posts with mentions or reviews of license-list-XML.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-10-09.
-
ZeroMQ – Relicense from LGPL3 and exceptions to MPL 2.0
The LGPLv3 exception had an atypical feature (for *GPL exceptions) and was possibly misdrafted, see: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1672
- SPDX: Add Prosperity-3.0.0 License
-
Olive Branches
X Doubt
-
BSV is no longer open source as defined by the Open Source Definition
Shortly after, they had the gall to ask for that garbage fire of a license to be included in a catalog of open source licenses. And then claimed to not understand how that request could possibly be denied...
-
How to use SPDX for licensing?
My doubt is if there is some programmatic use of SPDX. If not why they have such a strict syntax as specified here. Also there are multiple extra tools on the github repo for parsing, comparing and even generating spdx files like this. Now if user is just mentioning the license identifiers why do we need all these? And what does it mean to compare licenses as it seems that they're using string comparison techniques to find closest match to license in their catalogue.
-
The CSW Organizational Chart
Yes, they acted very puzzled when an open source license catalog refused to include their weird thing.
-
Craig Wright trying to sue people sharing the Bitcoin Whitepaper is probably the least "Satoshi" thing someone claiming to be Satoshi could do.
At some point, Daniel Connolly applied for OpenBSV to be included in the SPDX license list, but was promptly rejected due its field of use restriction.
bitbus
Posts with mentions or reviews of bitbus.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-19.
-
The CSW Organizational Chart
He also licensed at least one of his projects under the non-opensource license OpenBSV (https://github.com/interplanaria/bitbus/blob/master/LICENSE), a move that pleased Calvin so much he got CoinGeek to write a whole post about it.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing license-list-XML and bitbus you can also consider the following projects:
bitcoin-sv - Bitcoin SV (Satoshi Vision) is the original Bitcoin. This Github repository provides open-source software to enable use of Bitcoin SV.
linux - Linux kernel source tree
Bitcoin - Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ core engine in C++, implements ZMTP/3.1
OZ - OpenMAMA/ZeroMQ bridge