libuv VS rotor

I wound up on a different team with pre-existing Python code so temporarily shelved my use of Go for a bit, and we used Sanic (an async Python framework built on top of the excellent uvloop & libuv that also powers Node.js) to build some APIs for live channel management & operations. We hand-wrote our OpenAPI and used it to generate documentation and a CLI, which was an improvement over what was there (or not) before. Other teams used the OpenAPI document to generate SDKs to interact with our service.

In the source code of the Node.js opensource project, lib folder contains JavaScript code, mostly wrappers over C++ and function definitions. On the contrary, src folder contains C++ implementations of the functions, which pulls dependencies from the V8 project, the libuv project, the zlib project, the llhttp project, and many more - which are all placed at the deps folder.

Node.js is written in C, C++, and JavaScript. The core components of Node.js - the V8 engine and the libuv library - are written in C++ and C, respectively, since these languages provide low-level access to system resources, making them well-suited for building high-performance and efficient applications. JavaScript is mainly used to write the application logic.

Well, the single-threaded nature ultimately leads to its biggest downfall. Node.js utilizes a synchronous event loop engineered using Libuv that takes in code from the call stack and executes it.

Node.js executes JavaScript code in a single-threaded model. However, Node.js can function as a multithreaded framework by utilizing the libuv C library to create hidden threads (see the event loop) which handle I/O operations, and network requests asynchronously. But, CPU-intensive tasks such as image or video processing can block the event loop and prevent subsequent requests from executing, increasing the application's latency.

Hat's off for posting this 2 hours after it dropped!

I've been tracking the nest of issues with anticipation! This wasn't linked to https://github.com/libuv/libuv/pull/1947 when it posted, so I didn't see it. Very glad you linked it, thanks!

What you achieved, is handlers decoupling, i.e. when one handler knows nothing about other handler, which leads to good application testability. However, with standard promise/future bases messaging, if performance matters (and it usually does, otherwise why use C++?), i doubt that your implementation overwhelms the performance of specialized actor libraries, like sobjectizer ("batteries included" actors toolbox) or rotor (DIY-like actor constructor set; disclaimer: I'm the author of it).

I have been reading the documents from Boost.fibre and Boost.Signals2 which I could use, maybe ASIO for async. I also checked ZeroMQ (this seems to be more or less "only" for networking), Copper and Rotor. If this were just a simple MCU project I would just take the FreeRTOS and would have everything I need. Now I'm just lost how to structure my code / how to realize my main loop.

rotor actor library (I'm the author) was designed to solve similar problem, which I named "actor intrusiveness", when almost every piece of code should be written in form of actor, and, the working threads, which spin actors, are out of your control.

PS. I'm the author of rotor framework )

May be actor frameworks like caf, sobjectizer or rotor is something, that you are looking for.