libgrape-lite VS gtl

Compare libgrape-lite vs gtl and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
libgrape-lite gtl
3 5
365 89
1.1% -
6.3 7.1
28 days ago 21 days ago
C++ C++
Apache License 2.0 Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

libgrape-lite

Posts with mentions or reviews of libgrape-lite. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-17.

gtl

Posts with mentions or reviews of gtl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-07.
  • Inside boost::concurrent_flat_map
    4 projects | /r/cpp | 7 Jul 2023
    gtl library author here. Very nice writeup! Reading it made me think, and I believe I know why gtl::parallel_flat_hash_map performs comparatively worse for high-skew scenarios (just pushed a fix in gtl).
  • Boost 1.81 will have boost::unordered_flat_map...
    6 projects | /r/cpp | 31 Oct 2022
    I do this as well in my phmap and gtl implementations. It makes the tables look worse in benchmarks like the above, but prevents really bad surprises occasionally.
  • Comprehensive C++ Hashmap Benchmarks 2022
    3 projects | /r/cpp | 7 Sep 2022
    Thanks a lot for the great benchmark, Martin. Glad you used different hash functions, because I do sacrifice some speed to make sure that the performance of my hash maps doesn't degrade drastically with poor hash functions. Happy to see that my phmap and gtl (the C++20 version) performed well.
  • It is now trivial to cache pure functions with highly efficient, concurrent cache.
    1 project | /r/cpp | 3 Jul 2022
    This is very easy to do with the latest version of gtl. And it is extremely efficient, as the caching mechanism uses the parallel hashmap, which internally is divided into N submaps each with its own mutex, reducing mutex contention to a minimum.
  • Updating map_benchmarks: Send your hashmaps!
    13 projects | /r/cpp | 16 Jun 2022
    AFAIK sparsepp has been dropped entirely in favor of the containers in GTL: https://github.com/greg7mdp/gtl

What are some alternatives?

When comparing libgrape-lite and gtl you can also consider the following projects:

QuickQanava - :link: C++17 network / graph visualization library - Qt6 / QML node editor.

eytzinger - Cache-friendly associative STL-like container with an Eytzinger (BFS) layout for C++

GraphScope - 🔨 🍇 💻 🚀 GraphScope: A One-Stop Large-Scale Graph Computing System from Alibaba | 一站式图计算系统

fph-table - Flash Perfect Hash Table: an implementation of a dynamic perfect hash table, extremely fast for lookup

CXXGraph - Header-Only C++ Library for Graph Representation and Algorithms

Google Test - GoogleTest - Google Testing and Mocking Framework

euler - A distributed graph deep learning framework.

flat_hash_map - A very fast hashtable

libvineyard - vineyard (v6d): an in-memory immutable data manager. [Moved to: https://github.com/alibaba/v6d]

google-sparsehash - Clone of google-sparsehash

HPCInfo - Information about many aspects of high-performance computing. Wiki content moved to ~/docs.

libcudacxx - [ARCHIVED] The C++ Standard Library for your entire system. See https://github.com/NVIDIA/cccl