libfuzzer VS boofuzz

Compare libfuzzer vs boofuzz and see what are their differences.

libfuzzer

Thin interface for libFuzzer, an in-process, coverage-guided, evolutionary fuzzing engine. (by planetis-m)
Fuzzing unit-testing Hacking Security
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

boofuzz

A fork and successor of the Sulley Fuzzing Framework (by jtpereyda)
Fuzzing Python Security
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
WorkOS
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
libfuzzer boofuzz
1 1
42 1,949
- -
0.0 7.2
about 1 year ago 9 days ago
Nim Python
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

libfuzzer

Posts with mentions or reviews of libfuzzer. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning libfuzzer yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

boofuzz

Posts with mentions or reviews of boofuzz. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-07.
  • Microsoft Teams, Exchange Server, Windows 10 Hacked in Pwn2Own 2021
    2 projects | /r/sysadmin | 7 Apr 2021
    The one thing that's not really fully encapsulated in a lot of these comment chains below is the role of custom written fuzzers for competitions like this. Frameworks like AFL, BooFuzz, etc. A properly written test file will allow for most of the hunting to happen automagically by tampering with function calls or inputs until something crashes. By configuring an environment appropriately, you can run millions of test cases, and get the crashes logged to parse through later. This allows the researchers/exploit writers to only focus on the exceptions/traces that seem the most fruitful. This is one methodology, it's not the case for everyone, but most codebases are too big to go through the ASM by hand these days.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing libfuzzer and boofuzz you can also consider the following projects:

American Fuzzy Lop - american fuzzy lop - a security-oriented fuzzer

oss-fuzz - OSS-Fuzz - continuous fuzzing for open source software.

CrossHair - An analysis tool for Python that blurs the line between testing and type systems.

Awesome-Hacking - A collection of various awesome lists for hackers, pentesters and security researchers

dirsearch - Web path scanner

FDsploit - File Inclusion & Directory Traversal fuzzing, enumeration & exploitation tool.

hypothesis - Hypothesis is a powerful, flexible, and easy to use library for property-based testing.

kharma - Grammar-based fuzzing corpus generator

netzob - Netzob: Protocol Reverse Engineering, Modeling and Fuzzing

peafl64 - Static Binary Instrumentation tool for Windows x64 executables

0d1n - Tool for automating customized attacks against web applications. Fully made in C language with pthreads, it has fast performance.

Fuzzie - A VSCode GUI-based fuzzer for Rest API and GraphQL

boofuzz vs American Fuzzy Lop libfuzzer vs oss-fuzz boofuzz vs CrossHair libfuzzer vs Awesome-Hacking boofuzz vs dirsearch boofuzz vs FDsploit boofuzz vs hypothesis boofuzz vs kharma boofuzz vs netzob boofuzz vs peafl64 libfuzzer vs 0d1n boofuzz vs Fuzzie