lf VS ztncui

I've tried using LF in the past, but it didn't stick. Will definitely give this a go, as I'm trying to move to an pure terminal workflow as closely as possible.

https://github.com/gokcehan/lf

Hi. fff, lf, clifm Won't say they're best or not, rather interesting and maybe worth looking at. Looked up for the z in termux's repos and it's called "zoxide" there.

in the Github page for lf under etc, you can find instruction for making such a function for bash and fish.

I recently discovered an amazing terminal file manager (lf). The package is available for most mainstream distros but not for openSUSE.

For me, the main program missing is "lf" the ranger inspired terminal file manager. 5000 stars on Github, packaged in the official repos for basically anything under the sun except Fedora and a key part in my day-to-day workflow. https://github.com/gokcehan/lf

> they actively went after third party coordination servers, wherenas I hear headscale mentioned by tailscale employees all the time.

ZeroTier founder here. We never did anything remotely like that, so I'm curious about where you heard that.

We did adjust our licensing to counter people attempting to take the product, slap their own name on it, and monetize it without supporting us, but we are strongly considering going back to a more liberal license in the near future. In any case we didn't "go after" anyone, just limited commercial closed source use in a manner not unlike the AGPL. We never filed any kind of lawsuits about this or anything.

We also regularly promote third party open source products like this:

https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui

We've never had an issue with non-commercial or FOSS usage.

If you have a VPN somewhere, you could also try Nebula (https://www.defined.net/nebula/) or self-host the management server for Tailscale (https://github.com/juanfont/headscale) or zerotier (https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui).

Disadvantages: Limited to 50 hosts (you can host your own ZeroTier Controller using Ztncui for unlimited hosts: https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui)

You can self host a controller of adding/removing devices and all ( https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui ), but it has an upstream connection to their managed services, it’s how the apps and all keep working.

There are a couple of Options out there that make controlling the controller easier, either through WEB Guis: https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui https://github.com/dec0dOS/zero-ui

Every zerotier node ships with the CLI network controller, but someone wrote a simple GUI for it and that is on docker.

https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui

ZeroUI implements controller-specific workarounds that address some existing [issues](https://github.com/zerotier/ZeroTierOne/issues/859). ZTNCUI [does not](https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui/issues/63).

You can host your own authorization server. https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui