core VS Freenet

Reasonable people can disagree on licensing issues, and obviously they can give out grants under whatever conditions they like, but telling developers that JetBrains knows what license is best for your project's users seems intrusive to me. My project has almost 900 github stars, it's under the LGPL and in almost 7 years no user has ever asked for a less restrictive license.

Anyone interested could create a plugin for tailwind similar to this one for another CSS framework.

Kweb - A Kotlin web framework built on SSR (server side rendering)

User Manual: https://docs.kweb.io/book

Kweb is a novel web framework that acts as a remote interface to the web browser's DOM (Document Object Model). With Kweb, you can create and manipulate DOM elements and listen for and handle events, all using an intuitive Kotlin DSL that mirrors the structure of the HTML being created.

Kweb manages state through observable mutable values called kvars:

    import kweb.*

Github | User Manual | Release Notes

From the FreeNet Site

You are linking "original Freenet" to a PDF on freenet.org instead of linking to freenetproject.org ?

release-tag with the download and additional information: https://github.com/hyphanet/fred/releases/tag/build01497

It clashes with the Freenet project https://freenetproject.org/

Instead of use of Blockchain you could also use Freenet . The only bad thing here data could be lost, but mostly only data is lost when not used. This could be used to auto purge forks that most people dislike. If for example some reason there are multiple alternatives how the story goes some of them will die after a while and removed from system.

An automatically space balancing solution would be Freenet. Given that it's content addressing, it's possible to push data into it and have it deduplicate automatically.

fred: https://github.com/freenet/fred