kuroko VS xvm

I would say Kuroko makes more sense ;-P

Kuroko, it's basically python, but has code block / scope that makes more sense

Kuroko 1.3.0 gets a release candidate. Lots of big things since 1.2.5, like optimized method invocation, more operator overloads, better support for f-string expressions (format specs, =, faster constructions), a long type with my own bigint implementation (this was the last thing I was still regularly opening Python repls for, so a huge personal win). I also fixed a bunch of little things that have been nagging me, like the compiler can now compile expressions directly, which allowed me to remove the kludge that made the repl work previously. The WASM web repl also got some love with a port of the core of Hiwire from Pyodide, giving a very straightforward interface between JS and Kuroko in a browser - and I rebuilt the web IDE on it. I've also been working on a new compiler, which will hopefully form the basis of 2.0 - and this might be the last 1.x release (though I expect at least a few 1.3.x bug fix releases).

In case it's not clear, PonyOS is a joke reskin of my serious OS project, ToaruOS. PonyOS gets a new release every April 1st. All of the libraries and applications in ToaruOS are in-house things I built myself - the whole OS is "built from scratch". PonyOS adds ponysay, which is an external app originally written in Python - and in previous releases of PonyOS I shipped the Python version alongside a port of Python 3.6. This release, though, comes with a port to my own language, Kuroko, which is a dialect of Python - a lot of what went into building the PonyOS release this year was getting ponysay to work well.

Did this year's Advent of Code in Kuroko which sussed out some bugs and missing functionality. Better hashing for tuples, more builtins and methods on standard classes for improved compatibility with Python, general build cleanups. In the later problems, most suffering was caused by the GC, so I'd like to put more thought into collection strategies going forward.

Is it me you're looking for?

Parts of Ecstasy are now implemented in Ecstasy. Here's the Lexer, for example.

Ecstasy

A Future reference has the various capabilities that you'd imagine, taking lambdas for thenDo(), whenComplete(), etc. The reference, in the above example, is a local variable, so you just obtain it using the C-style & operator:

FWIW - here is the stage manager code that I referred to.

Ecstasy (xtclang.org): Currently working on session management for a cloud-based HTTP back end. Not exactly compiler or language stuff, but it certainly is exercising the compiler and language.

I prefer to make my AST nodes fairly rich, and let them do the brunt of the work themselves. Instead of the 5 lines of code above, the assignment statement node in Ecstasy is over 1000 LOC. But it handles everything from initial validation through the MLIR emission.

No, not that specific project. It's our own Mid Level Intermediate Representation (or Mid Level Intermediate Language), aka MLIR/MLIL. Here's a snapshot of the operators.

Ecstasy project on Github: https://github.com/xtclang/xvm

Quite a few improvements in Ecstasy over the past month:

Early on, we had the This keyword, and its meaning was "this type". So if a method on class Collection was declared as This add(Element), it meant that the method returned the auto-narrowing type of this. We later changed it from This to Collection (or whatever the class name is) and added the Collection! (non-narrowing) form, because there were syntactic needs (e.g. inner and outer auto-narrowing class references) that could not be covered by This. We evaluated a few different options, and we liked (and still like) the result that we came up with. That said, I still wish we had a This keyword (see the 5th bullet point) for the "this type", but 🤷‍♂️.