kubernetes-ingress VS application-gateway-kubernetes-ingress

Everything in the YAML snippets below — except for ingress configuration — relates to configuring the NGINX ingress controller. This includes customizing the default configuration.

In these examples, I assume that users have deployed an nginx-ingress-controller to their cluster through the eks layer. This controller is responsible for creating an nlb and exposing Elasticsearch and Kibana to the internet through their ingresses.

Now, you need to install the Nginx Ingress Controller so that it can redirect incoming requests to your payment app to use HTTPS. Since you've exposed the app using nodePort, you need to install the Ingress using a custom value file that specifies the service type to NodePort.

Kubernetes We have a kubernetes cluster which has a dropwizard based web application running as a service. This application has a rest uri to upload files. It cannot upload files larger than 1MB. I get the following error: ERROR [2017-07-27 13:32:47,629] io.dropwizard.jersey.errors.LoggingExceptionMapper: Error handling a request: ea812501b414f0d9! com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParseException: Unexpected character ('<' (code 60)): expected a valid value (number, String, array, object, 'true', 'false' or 'null')! at [Source: ! 413 Request Entity Too Large! ! 413 Request Entity Too Large! nginx/1.11.3! ! Hide resultsI have tried the suggestions given in https://github.com/nginxinc/kubernetes-ingress/issues/21. I have edited the Ingress to set the proxy-body-size annotation. Also, I have tried using the configMap without any success. we are using kubernetes version 1.5. Please let me know if you need additional information. Answer link : https://codehunter.cc/a/kubernetes/kubernetes-cannot-upload-files-larger-than-1mb

The example below shows how to configure a canary deployment using Nginx Ingress. The custom annotations used here are specific to Nginx:

This: https://kubernetes.github.io/ingress-nginx/ Not this: https://docs.nginx.com/nginx-ingress-controller/

So far, i've been following the example here to set up an nginx Ingress Controller and some test services behind it. However, I am unable to follow Step 6 which displays the external IP for the node that the load balancer is running on as my node does not have an ExternalIP in the addresses section, only a LegacyHostIP and InternalIP.

Also, of personal note, I highly recommend you use the "ingress-nginx" controller which has a huge community and is of much higher quality and flexibility than the "nginx-ingress controller by nginx inc". I've had a lot of success with dozens of clients with this controller. It rocks!

For example, the ingress project from NGINX has its own CRDs that give better control over service versions and blue/green and canary cutovers https://github.com/nginxinc/kubernetes-ingress/tree/v3.0.0/examples/custom-resources/traffic-splitting

Unfortunately in some cases it works poorly. For more insights, read this - https://github.com/Azure/application-gateway-kubernetes-ingress/issues/1124

My main concern is about zero-downtime deployments - https://github.com/Azure/application-gateway-kubernetes-ingress/blob/master/docs/how-tos/minimize-downtime-during-deployments.md

However, you better read and understand some specific behaviors of AGIC which are caused by its architecture - https://github.com/Azure/application-gateway-kubernetes-ingress/blob/master/docs/how-tos/minimize-downtime-during-deployments.md & https://github.com/Azure/application-gateway-kubernetes-ingress/issues/1124

application-gateway-kubernetes-ingress (Azure only)

Probably something like this https://azure.github.io/application-gateway-kubernetes-ingress/

AKS Application Gateway Ingress Controller is an ingress controller that configures the Azure Application Gateway.

AGIC has a lack of annotations that I find nginx+ offers like server snippets and custom headers. granted you can write re-write rules for AGIC with the help of the portal, it resets everything if one pod fails and this is a major showstopper for me. More info about the exact issue I'm talking about is in this issue. Apart from this, like the previous comments, the extra WAF rules and compliances offered makes AGIC a good choice if you don't have any extra header addition requirements like i do.

If you want Azure to manage ingress, you can use Azure application gateway and application gateway ingress controller (agic). However, if you want a public/private combination, fox example if you have 8 microservices out of which you want 6 to have private endpoint and 2 to have public endpoint over https, then it cannot be dones as agic only supports one ip per port. Also one agic can only use one application gateway (With auto management, meaning it automatically manages the listeners, https settings, backendpools, probes etc. on app gateway). If you it as shared gateway, then you need to manage application gateway manually (with az cli). Also, its github page has good how tos (https://github.com/Azure/application-gateway-kubernetes-ingress).