Kornia VS laserembeddings

Compare Kornia vs laserembeddings and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Kornia laserembeddings
11 2
9,364 223
2.5% -
9.4 0.0
7 days ago 9 months ago
Python Python
Apache License 2.0 BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Kornia

Posts with mentions or reviews of Kornia. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-14.

laserembeddings

Posts with mentions or reviews of laserembeddings. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-11-29.
  • Firefox Translations doesn't use the cloud
    13 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Nov 2022
    You're pretty much right on the money. For ParaCrawl[1] (which I worked on) we used fast machine translation systems that were "good enough" to translate one side of each pair to the language of the other, see whether they'd match sufficiently, and then deal with all the false positives through various filtering methods. Other datasets I know of use multilingual sentence embeddings, like LASER[2], to compute the distance between two sentences.

    Both of these methods have a bootstrapping problem, but at this point in the MT for many languages we have enough data to get started. Previous iterations of ParaCrawl used things like document structure and overlap of named entities among sentences to identify matching pairs. But this is much less robust. I don't know how they solve this problem today for low-resource languages.

    [1] https://paracrawl.eu

    [2] https://github.com/yannvgn/laserembeddings

  • SpaCy v3.0 Released (Python Natural Language Processing)
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 1 Feb 2021
    I've been using LASER from Facebook Research via https://github.com/yannvgn/laserembeddings to accept multi-lingual input in front of the the domain-specific models for recommendations and stuff (that are trained on English annotated examples).

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Kornia and laserembeddings you can also consider the following projects:

OpenCV - Open Source Computer Vision Library

syntaxdot - Neural syntax annotator, supporting sequence labeling, lemmatization, and dependency parsing.

Face Recognition - The world's simplest facial recognition api for Python and the command line

spaCy - 💫 Industrial-strength Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Python

EasyOCR - Ready-to-use OCR with 80+ supported languages and all popular writing scripts including Latin, Chinese, Arabic, Devanagari, Cyrillic and etc.

BLINK - Entity Linker solution

SimpleCV - The Open Source Framework for Machine Vision

wiktextract - Wiktionary dump file parser and multilingual data extractor

multi-object-tracker - Multi-object trackers in Python

projects - 🪐 End-to-end NLP workflows from prototype to production

gaps - A Genetic Algorithm-Based Solver for Jigsaw Puzzles :cyclone:

duckling - Language, engine, and tooling for expressing, testing, and evaluating composable language rules on input strings.