kitten
retroforth
Our great sponsors
| kitten | retroforth | |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 2 | |
| 1,074 | 93 | |
| - | - | |
| 1.2 | 0.0 | |
| about 1 year ago | 8 days ago | |
| Haskell | Forth | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
kitten
-
Retro: A Modern, Pragmatic Forth
While not quite a Forth, Kitten is a stack language:
https://kittenlang.org/
- Atunci când cauți de muncă și nu te mai angajează nimeni
-
Stack-based array-friendly static-typed proof of concept
Since you're making a statically-typed concatenative language, I'll point you to a joy reference, kitten, notes to motivate type checking stack languages, and a paper that formalizes type checking for stack languages. Since this looks like a relatively high-level stack language (given the presence of ADTs), you may find that you want to add quotes to your language, specifically opaque quotes since your language is typed. In that case, you'll realize that you'll need a better way to formulate polymorphism over stacks, and the paper on type checking will provide that to you.
-
A Forth Apologia
Well, there is Kitten, although it hasn't seen an update in two years and was moving quite slowly before that too.
https://kittenlang.org/
- main repo
-
Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Author ended up doing a lot of work on Kitten https://github.com/evincarofautumn/kitten
- The Kitten Programming Language
-
my cat is installing debian 10
Kitten lang
-
I much prefer `data.action()` to `action(data). Is it an r/unpopularopinion?
You may like https://kittenlang.org/
retroforth
-
Why Concatenative Programming Matters
Its seen as bad practice to use anything but one argument per word.
There's also quotations, retroforth[1] tends to use a prefix based system for indicating the type of the argument, c:put will print a character, s:put will print a string.
https://github.com/crcx/retroforth/blob/master/doc/NamingCon...
-
RetroForth 2021.4 Released
Source is at http://forthworks.com/retro/r/RETRO12-2021.4.tar.gz or can be grabbed from Github at https://github.com/crcx/retroforth/releases/tag/v2021.4 or sr.ht at https://git.sr.ht/~crc_/retroforth/archive/191e64e5e224df6f8d67b137ba416fe0b39d38bd.tar.gz.
What are some alternatives?
JDK - JDK main-line development https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk
jvm-parser - A Haskell parser for JVM bytecode files
mlatu - A declarative concatenative programming language
haskell-exp-parser - Simple parser parser from Haskell to TemplateHaskell expressions
resin - Vector space search engine. Available as a HTTP service or as an embedded library.
egison-quote - Quasi quotes for Egison expression
language-dot - A library for the analysis and creation of Graphviz DOT files
ast-monad - A library for constructing AST by using do-notation
gale - Strongly-typed, minimal-ish, stack-based development at storm-force speed.
raw-feldspar - Resource-AWare Feldspar
porth