kernl VS serve

I periodically check kernl.ai to see whether the documentation and tutorial sections have been expanded. My advice is put some real effort and focus in to examples and tutorials. It is key for an optimization/acceleration library. 10x-ing the users of a library like this is much more likely to come from spending 10 out of every 100 developer hours writing tutorials, as opposed to spending those 8 or 9 of those tutorial-writing hours on developing new features which only a small minority understand how to apply.

FlashAttention + quantization has to the best of knowledge not yet been explored, but I think it would a great engineering direction. I would not expect to see this any time soon natively in PyTorch's BetterTransformer though. /u/pommedeterresautee & folks at ELS-RD made an awesome work releasing kernl where custom implementations (through OpenAI Triton) could maybe easily live.

Check https://github.com/ELS-RD/kernl/blob/main/src/kernl/optimizer/linear.py for an example.

https://github.com/ELS-RD/kernl/issues/141 > Would it be possible to use kernl to speed up Stable Diffusion?

What's wrong with just using Torchserve[1]? We've been using it to serve embedding models in production.

[1] https://pytorch.org/serve/

Looks like you are already up to speed loading LLaMa models which is great. Assuming this is Hugging Face PyTorch checkpoint, I think it should be possible to spin up a TorchServe instance which has in-built support for API access and HF Transformers. Since scale and latency aren’t a big concern for you, this should be good enough start.

You could split the service in two, flask for the web part and a service to serve the model, I haven't used it but there is https://pytorch.org/serve/

I'm attempting to set up inference for a torchserve container, and it's really tough to figure out what's not allowing me to connect to my network with the ports that I'm trying to expose. I'm using Google Kubernetes Engine and Helm via tweaking one of the tutorials at [torchserve](github.com/pytorch/serve). Specifically, it's the GKE tutorial [here](https://github.com/pytorch/serve/tree/master/kubernetes).

I did a Space to showcase a bit the speedups we can have in a end-to-end case with TorchServe to deploy the model on a cloud instance (AWS EC2 g4dn, using one T4 GPU): https://huggingface.co/spaces/fxmarty/bettertransformer-demo

For 2), I am aware of a few options. Triton inference server is an obvious one as is the ‘transformer-deploy’ version from LDS. My only reservation here is that they require the model compilation or are architecture specific. I am aware of others like Bento, Ray serving and TorchServe. Ideally I would have something that allows any (PyTorch model) to be used without the extra compilation effort (or at least optionally) and has some convenience things like ease of use, easy to deploy, easy to host multiple models and can perform some dynamic batching. Anyway, I am really interested to hear people's experience here as I know there are now quite a few options! Any help is appreciated! Disclaimer - I have no affiliation or are connected in any way with the libraries or companies listed here. These are just the ones I know of. Thanks in advance.

If you built the model using pytorch or tensorflow, I'd suggest using torchserve or TF serving to serve the model as its own "microservice," then query it from your django app. Among other things, it will make retraining and updating your model a lot easier.

GitHub