juvix VS mi-cho-coq

Compare juvix vs mi-cho-coq and see what are their differences.


Juvix empowers developers to write code in a high-level, functional language, compile it to gas-efficient output VM instructions, and formally verify the safety of their contracts prior to deployment and execution. (by anoma)
Our great sponsors
  • OPS - Build and Run Open Source Unikernels
  • SonarLint - Deliver Cleaner and Safer Code - Right in Your IDE of Choice!
  • Scout APM - Less time debugging, more time building
juvix mi-cho-coq
5 6
279 -
4.3% -
9.6 -
4 days ago -
GNU General Public License v3.0 only -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of juvix. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-05-16.


Posts with mentions or reviews of mi-cho-coq. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-01-19.
  • 12 reasons Cardano can't scale in 2022
    8 projects | reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency | 19 Jan 2022
    There are similarities between the promises made by Cardano and what you find in Tezos: * proof-of-stake L1s * on-chain voting: Voltaire for Cardano vs periodic elections on Tezos (already 8 important upgrades of the protocol that were voted for, with the Foundation abstaining!) * formal verification of contracts and the chain itself: mentioned here for Cardano vs several projects in Tezos (Mi-Cho-Coq, foobar.land, both using the Coq proof assistant) * ongoing work on L2s: Hydra for Cardano vs Deku, zkRollups and optimistic rollups as well (a bit similar to Arbitrum IIRC).
  • Formal Verification: Tezos’s Feature Nobody Talks About
    1 project | reddit.com/r/tezos | 8 Dec 2021
    We are not working with LIGO to verify smart contracts, more with Mi-Cho-Coq which aims to verify smart contracts directly at the Michelson level. Using Mi-Cho-Coq it is possible to verify the Michelson output of LIGO or SmartPy. I heard LIGO people also have projects to do verification directly at the LIGO's level or verify the implementation of the LIGO compiler.
  • Front running and general architecture?
    1 project | reddit.com/r/tezos | 2 Sep 2021
    Formal verification for smart contracts. Many (Not all) categories of vulnerabilities can be avoided that way. See fe: https://medium.com/coinmonks/verify-a-smart-contract-with-archetype-6e0ea548e2da or https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq which can be used on any michelson code.
  • About Michelson design
    3 projects | reddit.com/r/tezos | 5 Aug 2021
  • ELI5 This “superior tech” Tezos has
    5 projects | reddit.com/r/tezos | 29 Mar 2021
    The link to the Coq formalization of Michelson, to formally verify smart-contracts: https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq
  • Supporting EVM, WASM Bitcoin Script, etc.
    1 project | reddit.com/r/tezos | 19 Feb 2021
    Web assembly is stack-based and there are tools like KWasm for formal verification - so a move to WASM is a more likely candidate... but Michelson is a very capable and verifiable stack based low-level language too. https://gitlab.com/nomadic-labs/mi-cho-coq/

What are some alternatives?

When comparing juvix and mi-cho-coq you can also consider the following projects:

plutus - The Plutus language implementation and tools

linear-base - Standard library for linear types in Haskell.

salmonella - Wrecking sandwich traders for fun and profit



factor - Factor programming language