just-flake
Use `just` in your Nix devShells with re-usable and share-able targets. (by juspay)
flake-parts
❄️ Simplify Nix Flakes with the module system (by hercules-ci)
just-flake | flake-parts | |
---|---|---|
1 | 5 | |
44 | 877 | |
- | 3.9% | |
5.1 | 8.0 | |
11 months ago | 19 days ago | |
Nix | Nix | |
MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
just-flake
Posts with mentions or reviews of just-flake.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-27.
-
I stopped worrying and loved Makefiles
I've been using this on almost all of my projects, and am really pleased with it. Shell autocompletion is a nice bonus. If you also Nix, checkout `just-flake`:
https://github.com/juspay/just-flake
flake-parts
Posts with mentions or reviews of flake-parts.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-15.
-
Nix is a better Docker image builder than Docker's image builder
There are attempts like
https://flake.parts/
or
https://github.com/nix-community/flakelight
Their aim is to create an ecosystem of reusable Nix libraries. But it is tiny.
-
Nix noob question
You can also just install flakes doing nix profile install . I wrote a tool to make it a bit easier, npt but it's completely optional. Once you install the packages with nix profile. Then in your repos you can use a flake with a devShell and run nix develop. Check https://flake.parts to write your flakes.
-
I'm getting on the hype train. What do you recommend to beginner?
Definitely use flakes from the get-go. It's much more sane. Nix's documentation can be unorganized, but read through it when you can. Modules and other projects tend to have their own documentation as well, like Home Manager and flake-parts
-
Why you don't need flake-utils
That's not a typo, there OP is referring to https://github.com/hercules-ci/flake-parts
What are some alternatives?
When comparing just-flake and flake-parts you can also consider the following projects:
discord-plays-pokemon - Twitch Plays Pokémon, but for Discord
treefmt-nix - treefmt nix configuration
macos-cross-compiler - Compile binaries for macOS on Linux
nixt - Simple unit-testing for Nix [maintainer=@Lord-Valen]
just - 🤖 Just a command runner
haumea - Filesystem-based module system for Nix [maintainer=@figsoda]