jupyter-cadquery
dactyl-cc
Our great sponsors
jupyter-cadquery | dactyl-cc | |
---|---|---|
11 | 28 | |
296 | 344 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 1.5 | |
12 months ago | 12 months ago | |
Python | C++ | |
Apache License 2.0 | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
jupyter-cadquery
-
Show HN: Consol3 β A 3D engine in the terminal that executes on the CPU
supports WebGL over SSH/MoSH
https://www.brow.sh/docs/introduction/ :
> The terminal client updates and renders in realtime so that, for instance, you can watch videos. It uses the UTF-8 half-block trick () to get 2 colours from every character cell, thus simulating basic graphics.
https://github.com/fathyb/carbonyl :
> Carbonyl originally started as html2svg and is now the runtime behind it.
Always wondered how brew.sh added the brew sprite there; that's real nice.
TIL that e.g. Kitty term can basically framebuffer modified Chrome?
https://github.com/chase/awrit :
> Yep, actual Chromium being rendered in your favorite terminal that supports the Kitty terminal graphics protocol.
FWIW Cloudflare has clientless Remote Browser Isolation that also splits the browser at the rendering engine.
A TUI Manim renderer would be neat. Re: Teaching math with Manim and interactive 3d: https://github.com/bernhard-42/jupyter-cadquery/issues/99
What would you add to make it easier to teach with this entirely CPU + software rendering codebase?
What prompts for learning would you suggest?
- Pixar in a Box, Wikipedia history of CG industry: https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/#comment-36265807
- "Rotate a wireframe cube or the camera perspective with just 2d pixels to paint to; And then rotate the cube about a point other than the origin, and then move the camera while the cube is rotating"
- OTOH, ManimML, Yellowbrick, and the ThreeJS Wave/Particle simulator might be neat with a slow terminal framebuffer too
-
A blocky based CAD program
What a great idea.
TIL about jupyterlab-blockly https://jupyterlab-blockly.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
https://jupyterlab-blockly.readthedocs.io/en/latest/other_ex... :
> The JupyterLab-Blockly extension is ready to be used as a base for other projects: you can register new Blocks, Toolboxes and Generators. It is a great tool for fast prototyping."
jupyter-cadquery: https://github.com/bernhard-42/jupyter-cadquery
"Generate code from GUI interactions"
-
Is geopandas right for this use case or should I be looking at something else? Looking to create, manipulate, and measure closed polylines with arc segments across a shared geometric space.
CADQuery
-
Updates to the Fusion 360 Simulation Workspace
> Couldn't you equivalently use any STL/STEP/AMF viewer?
I'm not sure. A quick feedback loop is important. With OpenSCAD and CadQuery, you write code that defines the geometry. You then want to see what the geometry looks like, and possibly debug it. For this, you generally want to be able to give certain parts a different color, or opacity, wireframe, etc.
STL is out; it has to tessellate geometry turning it into triangles. AFAIK, it only supports one object. This means a sensible wireframe is out, and so are multiple parts. AMF has similar drawbacks. STEP files might work.
Generally, my understanding is many people write OpenSCAD code in their editor of choice, and then simply save the file. When you open an existing file in OpenSCAD GUI, it monitors it for changes, and refreshes. So this is great.
That said, I misspoke a bit. CQ-Editor is definitely somewhat close to OpenSCAD. It still has a - in my view - unnecessary code editor. But the last standalone release is over a year ago, and I found it to be extremely buggy on macOS. It crashes quite often. Meanwhile, Jupyer-CadQuery [0] works great.
> Seems a good choice to me that the GUI is a separate/subordinate project. I suppose it is somewhat necessary to have it at all, easier to gain popularity if you can show screenshots and have a single app 'quickstart'.
Generally, I think this is true. My personal opinion is I can be productive with something that has a minimal set of features but is rock-solid; over something that has gobs of features but is buggy. That was my main issue with FreeCAD. Ease of installation is another big one. For all it's issues, OpenSCAD gets both of these things right.
-
What do you think?
I had some success with using the pre-built image. Itβs good enough if you want to play around with the example notebooks out of the box if you run the container without any volume mapping.
-
Learning CAD on Linux
Yep. I currently use https://github.com/bernhard-42/jupyter-cadquery; it is a jupyter-based notebook integrating cadquery. If you can do it with OpenSCAD you can do it with cadquery, the difference being working with real CAD primitives, a richer language and more features. If you do not need some of the more advanced operators which are missing in the internal CAD engine it is a very solid choice in my opinion for parametric modelling at its peak.
-
Recommendations for polygon visualization
Neat, you might be interested in this cadquery integration with Jupyter notebooks, https://github.com/bernhard-42/jupyter-cadquery
-
Help - building OpenSCAD files for Tractyl Manuform 5x6
yes thats the one. the python version is easier to work with imho, you can set it up with jupyter-cadquery + anaconda (https://github.com/bernhard-42/jupyter-cadquery) and generate results in the browser / vscode . depending on your understanding of python it shouldnt be too difficult, you probably cant take it across directly but a lot of the default values etc should transfer. and the rest just requires looking at existing code + cadquery documentation.
-
Anyone interested in a 14x21 dactyl?
One day I'll finish my keyboard using joshreve's framework, It definitely is a way better experience when doing lots of changes, especially with (https://github.com/bernhard-42/jupyter-cadquery)
-
Considering my first real build - dactyl v. dactyl/manuform?
customising my own version similar to dactyl tracer and I'm using joshreve's port to python ( https://github.com/joshreve/dactyl-keyboard ) with jupyter cadquery (https://github.com/bernhard-42/jupyter-cadquery), which lets you customise/generate your keyboard in the browser and view the output more easily, after which you can export straight to stl (https://imgur.com/a/HX0DLxw)
dactyl-cc
- i just got an old kb500. any tips for controllers and cases?
-
Travel keyboard options
Keeping with keywells, there's the split kinesis advantage boards: - Without palm rest: Dactyl CC - With palm rest: Ergo S-1
-
Best DIYable KA360-like board?
I need a split keyboard with concave key wells that also has an ergonomic palm/wrist rest like Kinesis Advantage boards have. I borrowed a friend's Kinesis Advantage 2 for a mont last year and it was fantastic - much more comfortable for me than the handful of dactyl and dactyl-manuform variants I've tried (although I wished I could have slightly adjusted the spacing between the two sides). I'm not very able to pay to try a KA360 or Glove80 at the moment, but I have a well-tuned 3D printer and a drawer of various key switches. I know that critical aspects of Kinesis' form factor are patented, but I'm wondering if anyone has suggestions for DIY boards that feel a bit more similar to the real thing. Extra points for boards with 36-ish keys (more keys is fine, too, though). Trackballs are nice, too, but not required - either way, I'll probably add a TrackPoint on the right side. I've had my eye on the Charybdis Nano, but I'm not convinced I'll actually find it comfortable. If anyone has used both the Charybdis and the Kinesis Advantage, subjective comparisons are appreciated. I'm also curious about what the Dactyl-CC, and if people who've tried it feel it lives up to it's description of being more Kinesis-like. Thanks!
-
Layout review: Roast my choices
I'm building a keyboard inspired by the dactyl-cc (and by the Kinesis Advantage 360 by proxy). Before I started out laying up stuff, I've been thinking on the general layout. All feedback is welcome!
- How do the dactyl manuform and its variants compare to the Kinesis Advantage 2?
- Kinesis Advantage 360 Pro with PBT keycap from keycap.sh
- Need Help Getting Set Up Quickly With Split Keyboard
-
Ergonomics of dactyl manuform compared to kinesis 2
The Dactyl variant the closest to OG Kinesis in spirit is Dactyl-CC AFAIK.
-
Kinesis 360 DIY?
Also worth checking out: https://github.com/mjohns/dactyl-cc
-
Looking for an QMK compatible Ergo close to the Kinesis advantage II
Not sure it qualifies as easy to build, but if you are willing to jump in a bit the Dactyl-cc is designed to feel just like the KA2. That's my current daily driver. It's a 3d printed body, so you'll have to order prints and do some hand wiring. If that's more than you want to sign up for it's probably not a good fit, but I've really enjoyed it. Here's the github: https://github.com/mjohns/dactyl-cc
What are some alternatives?
NURBS-Python - Object-oriented pure Python B-Spline and NURBS library
dactyl-manuform
libfive - Infrastructure for solid modeling
custom-bluetooth-dactyl-manuform - A custom, Cherry profile, Bluetooth, Dactyl Manuform Keyboard
Pythonocc-nodes-for-Ryven - Pythonocc nodes for Ryven
awesome-kinesis - Unofficial curated list of resources and references for Kinesis keyboard enthusiasts
jupyterlab-classic - JupyterLab distribution with a retro look and feel π
tracer - Dactly Tracer 3d printed keyboard
Pluto.jl - π Simple reactive notebooks for Julia
dactyl-cc-zmk - My ZMK config for dactyl-cc keyboard
pythonocc-core - Python package for 3D CAD/BIM/PLM/CAM
STONER - A Dactyl like 3d printed keyboard written in C++