JSS VS Tailwind CSS

Most websites those days are SPA applications that render on the front-side. There is also this trend of CSS in JavaScript also knowns as JSS that is debatable (makes everything overcomplicated), but in some specific cases, can be justified and very useful.

> why tf aren't we using JS for styling already

People are and have been for quite a while

https://cssinjs.org/

JSS

It is possible. At its most simple, you could just modify the style property on every element. That's not generally considered best practice, but there are a number of "CSS-in-JS" libraries which streamline the process. The typically generate dynamic CSS classes and apply them to your elements. A big one is JSS.

import React, { useState, useEffect } from "react"; import Amplify, { API, graphqlOperation } from "aws-amplify"; import { createBlog } from "./graphql/mutations"; import { listBlogs } from "./graphql/queries"; import awsExports from "./aws-exports"; import { ListBlogsQuery } from "./API"; Amplify.configure(awsExports); const initialState = { name: "", body: "" }; const App = () => { const [formState, setFormState] = useState(initialState); const [blogs, setBlogs] = useState(); useEffect(() => { fetchBlogs() }, []); const handleInputChange = (event: React.ChangeEvent) => { setFormState({ ...formState, [event.target.name]: event.target.value }); }; const fetchBlogs = async () => { try { const blogData = (await API.graphql(graphqlOperation(listBlogs))) as { data: ListBlogsQuery } setBlogs(blogData.data); } catch (err) { console.log("Error fetching blogs" + err); } }; const addBlog = async () => { try { if (!formState.name || !formState.body) return; const blog = { ...formState }; if (blogs) { await API.graphql(graphqlOperation(createBlog, { input: blog })); await fetchBlogs(); setFormState(initialState); } } catch (err) { console.log("error creating blog: ", err); } }; return (

Amplify Todos

Create Blog {blogs && blogs?.listBlogs?.items?.map((blog, index) => { return (

{blog?.name}

{blog?.body}

); })}

); }; const styles = { container: { width: 400, margin: "0 auto", display: "flex", //real weird issue: https://github.com/cssinjs/jss/issues/1344 flexDirection: "column" as "column", justifyContent: "center", padding: 20, }, todo: { marginBottom: 15 }, input: { border: "none", backgroundColor: "#ddd", marginBottom: 10, padding: 8, fontSize: 18, }, todoName: { fontSize: 20, fontWeight: "bold" }, todoDescription: { marginBottom: 0 }, button: { backgroundColor: "black", color: "white", outline: "none", fontSize: 18, padding: "12px 0px", }, }; export default App;

Material UI v5 brought some amazing updates, but switching from JSS to Emotion had an arguably nasty side-effect: it was no longer as straightforward to group your component styles in classes. Fortunately, a fantastic library emerged that allowed developers to not only reduce the extreme pain from migrating all their classes from v4's makeStyles to emotion, but to also to continue to writing classes in practically the same syntax, with wonderful TS type-safety. This library was tss-react, and it was one of my favorite open source discoveries of 2021.

I started writing a long response, but I want to add that a simple CRA + JSS + TS (named exports only) stack solves or abstracts away most of these issues.

JSS

This app was built with Svelte Kit, Tailwind CSS, and many other technologies. For a full rundown, please visit the GitHub repository

Unlike Tailwind, which has over 77,000 stars on GitHub, Mojo CSS has about 200 stars on GitHub. But the Mojo CSS documentation is fairly good and you can find most of the information you’ll need there.

JavaScript React Flowbite Tailwind Firebase - Auth, Database, and Hosting Vite

- Performance is a feature.

Another common interpretation of brutalism is aesthetic, reacting to overly complicated user interfaces by creating simpler, more direct ones. Tailwind CSS (https://tailwindcss.com), one of today's most popular CSS libraries, promotes this approach in its component examples. There's also a neat library I've seen recently called "Neobrutalism Components" for React that I like (https://neobrutalism-components.vercel.app), providing components with a similar look and feel to Gumroad. This might more accurately be called 'Neo-Brutalism,' as noted in the comments.

A more engineering-centric interpretation of Brutalism focuses on form, structure, and efficiency, drawing significantly from brutalist architecture principles. Apart from the user interface itself, most mobile, desktop, and web applications are extremely bloated and often perform worse than sites from 10 years ago did. While one HTML file might be "less brutalist" than the original HN site, it is substantially more brutalist than any HN mobile app in existence, and offers nearly identical functionality.

A broader interpretation of brutalism, which could be termed 'Meta-Brutalism,' is embodied in the overall experience on this site through UX flows. Yes, in the strictest sense, the original HN site is more Brutalist in many ways, but it only shows 30 articles at a time and does not function as a PWA. For this site, the experience of reading 10 stories is arguably less brutalist, but for quickly browsing through several pages and skimming articles (which is how I read HN) it is a lot faster, and in my opinion, more Brutalist.

My primary inspiration was addressing software and tool bloat in UIs rather than strictly adhering to every principle set forth by David Bryant Copeland. I don't find it convincing that this site "isn't brutalist" compared to really any other experience apart from the Main HN site, and I would argue the overall experience is more brutalist in its performance and scrolling behavior.

As a side note: I generally don't like Brutalist architecture that much although I believe it is unfairly maligned. I visited the Salk Institute once and enjoyed it though (https://www.archdaily.com/61288/ad-classics-salk-institute-l...).

- Staff Software Engineer ($275k/yr): https://tailwindcss.com/careers/staff-software-engineer

We're small, independent, and profitable, with a team of just 6 people doing millions in revenue, and growing sustainably every year. You'd work directly with the founders on open-source software used by millions of people.

If you like the idea of working on a small team that cares about craft and isn't trying to achieve VC scale, I think this is a pretty awesome place to do your best work.

Instead of Booststrap, I used Tailwind CSS as the CSS library.

Tailwind CSS: A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom designs.

Basic knowledge of Tailwind CSS and MobX-State-Tree

Tailwind is a CSS framework that speeds up the development process by allowing you to quickly write utility classes directly in your TSX markup.

Tailwind CSS