JSHint VS JS-Beautifier

jshint -> Old library

also, if you are going to code for this sheet and do not know about the website jshint.com, you need to know about jshint.com

There is an error in some file. Or maybe some wine shenanigans (never used it). You can try searching for the file item-possessionLimit.js and paste it into something like https://jshint.com/ to get an analysis and try to fix it. But it might give you further errors or file might be packed somewhere.

If you are coding for this sheet and you do not know about jshint.com ...

JSHint

I came across a problem where I had to find the ES6 features used by any javascript project and other data regarding their use. When I reached out to stackoverflow, I could find only one relevant post which asks you to use linters like jshint/jshint or compilers like babel. Jslint didn't seem to report anything specific to ES6 and Babel converts all the ES6+ features to ES5 but doesn't report anything regarding which constructs were used or how many times they were used. However, Jshint reported all ES6 features used in the code along with some metadata. And, to suit my needs, I ended up writing a python script that calls Jshint on all JS files in a project and presents the features used in the project and the number of times they were used across all files. You can find the code here : jsHintRunner

Javascript Linting parses and checks if any syntax is violating the rule. If a violation occurs, a warning is shown explaining unexpected behavior. Use the online version for small projects: JSLint, ESLint or JSHint. For larger projects, it is recommended to use a task runner like Gulp or Grunt. Linters ensure developers are following the best practices as a result of which few bugs appear during project development.

If you don't know https://jshint.com/ and want to script for this sheet, then you should know https://jshint.com/

If you don't know it, you should: jshint.com That website has saved me a few headaches.

Did you try jshint.com ?

Even without tools it looked a bit weird, all files in source without minification costs us 27k, its something not needed inside, and if you unpack it with something like https://beautifier.io/ you will see:

I can go through the functions that I have wrote in here. Go to js beautifier and paste in the code for easier viewing while reading this.

I just cobbled together a version using js-beautify https://github.com/beautify-web/js-beautify, works for JavaScript and JSON, does not format HTML correctly.

View source and get the main javascript file https://musicforprogramming.net/client/client.bc21fa59.js then stick it in a beautifier https://beautifier.io/ then grab the most likely looking function, the easiest way is to delete everything that's obviously nothing to do with the animation, then what you have left is the code you want.

One that is customizable, I don't know. Always used vscode formatter with default settings (are there some options?) Or prettier. Maybe https://github.com/beautify-web/js-beautify

Sprite list from the randomizer can be found at https://alttpr.com/sprites/ with links to the zspr files (copy/paste the output into https://beautifier.io/ to make it more readable)

You can use an online service like beautifier.io to try to clean it up a bit. There is no way to get the original human readable JS back though. If you are interested in reading source code, you might have more luck looking at repos on GitHub, which will not be minified.

This is fantastic, thank you for the decoded output. I had run it through Beautifier.io to get some of the unicode/hex characters decoded, but this is much more readable.