jquery.terminal VS lila

Few of my Open Source projects: * jQuery terminal * LIPS Scheme * Gaiman * Sysend * Wayne

But then I realized that I should probably will need to use jsDOM. This is the library that can be used in nodejs to mock the DOM. This is what jest testing framework is using and this is what I was using to test jQuery Terminal library in Jasmine before jest was created.

Creating such a styled console website or fake terminal website is easier if you have a library that will give you the look and feel of the real terminal emulator, with a nice API to create commands, so you don’t need to create it from scratch. We will use the JavaScript Terminal library: jQuery Terminal, which gives a simple, but powerful API to create interactive terminals on any website. The library doesn’t use any HTML5 features and uses ES5 so it will work on any Browser even in IE11.

There is way more than in the Wikipedia article. I was implementing an interpreter for ANSI Art some time ago, maybe you will find it helpful. After a lot of struggle with my own parser using regular expressions, someone suggested that I should use a real parser which I use now. My project is in JavaScript and I used Node Ansi parser. It handles all ANSI escape code including cursor movements. There are no good documentation, I got help from one of the contributors that were also a contributor to the XTerm.js library. You can see my code that uses the library here: unix_formatting.js the file includes NodeAnsiParser.

I've wanted to have my own programming language, that will make it easier to create text-based adventure games for my Open Source project jQuery Terminal. The idea for the language came after I've created a paid gig for one person, let's call him Ken, that needed this type of game, where the user interacted with the terminal and was asked a bunch of questions and it was like an adventure game, related to Crypo. The code I've written, that Ken needed, was data-driven by a JSON file. It was working nicely, Ken could easily change the JSON and have the game changed however he wanted. I've asked if I could share the code since it was a very cool project and Ken agreed that I can do that two months after he publish the game. But after a while, I've realized that I can have something much better. My own DSL language, that will make it simpler to create text-based adventure games. A person with a bit of programming knowledge like Ken, could easily edit the game, because the language will be much simpler than complex JavaScript code that is needed for something like this. And even if I would be asked to create a game like the one for Ken, it would be much easier and faster for me. This is how Gaiman programming language has started.

My jQuery Termial: https://terminal.jcubic.pl/ library. It started more the 10 years ago. It's written in ES5, I didn't wanted to do that, but I'm thinking about creating version 3.0 that would be a rewrite in latest JavaScript or TypeScript.

I'm working on a language called Gaiman similar to ruby that compiles to JavaScript. The purpose of the language is to simplify creating interactive text games, first for the Web later maybe for the normal terminal. The web part is based on my jQuery Terminal library.

If you don't mind using jQuery Based Terminal library. You can do almost everything (except I don't know how to create floating domain animation) with https://terminal.jcubic.pl/. You can think about jQuery Termial as a framework. You don't need ReactJS or Angular for this.

The library supports typing animation and changing colors. You can easily create the same interactive console.

If you're interested I can create a demo for this.

Lichess - Online Chess Server. Scala, TypeScript

> the player who committed more blunders lost 86% of the time

In some sense this is almost tautological. While finding an exact definition for a chess blunder isn't straightforward, here is one example from the Lichess UI:

https://github.com/lichess-org/lila/blob/b527746b179cdde6438...

Basically, if you make a move which decreases your winning probability more than 14% over the best move, that's a blunder. But winning probability is a nonlinear function of stockfish centipawns. A drop in 100 centipawns when you're up 15 points isn't a blunder. When the game was equal, it is.

Point is, by the time you know it's a blunder you already know something about the outcome of that move, that it swung the winning probability by more than 14%. So the analysis is kind of just measuring some function of winning probability and saying that it is highly correlated with winning probability.

If you want to improve make it your goal to play the best chess you can, not increase an arbitrary number. Watch YouTube series like John Bartholomew's "Climb the Rating Ladder" for some general insight into what you might be doing wrong. Read Irving Chernev's "Logical Chess: Move By Move" to see the thinking process of high level players. Do lots of puzzles (I like lichess.org for puzzles). And always analyze your games. When you analyze make it your goal to find at least two things you could have improved.

The easiest way to play against Stockfish is perhaps on https://lichess.org/, but it's not the only chess engine that evaluates positions with a neural network.

Lichess.com

if you actually like chess, try lichess.org, the free and open-source, no ads ever, premium alternative

The Chessnut Evo works almost flawlessly (I did not experience this issue but people have reported having ChessnutVision stop working on occasion which requires turning on/off to fix) with popular chess sites (officially supported are chess.com, lichess.org, Chess Kid and Chessable). I experienced no major lag when playing games on Lichess through the board There is the unavoidable delay of physically moving pieces, so it may not be ideal for blitz But for rapid or longer time controls. the ability to have your OTB games instantly logged and the ability to effortlessly analyze games after is game-changing for me. The one occasional hiccup I encountered was when quickly sliding pieces, it would register an incorrect move. But that’s an easy fix of adjusting the Limbo move delay (I don't like this option as it makes the board feel less responsive I prefer to just be aware and lift pieces instead of sliding).