joi VS Nest

Package Feature Merit Demerit Link Zod TypeScript-first schema validation with static type inference Method chaining and easy to get ts type Newer package zod.dev joi This is almost same to zod Have many plugins Doesn't support static type inference https://github.com/sideway/joi Yup This is almost same to zod Have many plugins Missing some feature, function, deep object, promise... ... https://github.com/jquense/yup class-validator Validate class properties Have many features Code isn't clean https://github.com/typestack/class-validator ajv Validate by json scheme Enable to share schem to other languages Not supported typescript https://ajv.js.org/

Using Joi, a data validator for JavaScript.

See how I've used joi for validating the request body. You can install and use different libraries like this inside the helpers/routes. Joi can be installed with the following command:

3. joi

⭐ Recommended: Doing this manually is a ton of work, and if you're dealing with unknown objects often it would be better to lean onto a validation library to simplify it. My personal favorite is superstruct, although lots of people like joi or zod. They all do the same thing

The class-validator / class-transform looks really nice for formatting/validation but there is also joi. suretype is attractive since theoretically typeconv could generate jsonSchema for json-schema-faker and Open API docs.

Since Typescript is just a language and not a library of some sorts, it doesn't add runtime functionality. If this is what you're after, there's so many libraries that help converting unknown's into known types - joi, yup, superstruct (my choice), purify-ts Codec, io-ts

What does this library provide that is not provided by Yup, Zod, Superstruct (a personal favorite), Joi, Nope, computed-types, typanion, and all the other validation libraries?

True, I remember there's Yup and joi for JavaScript

When using the NestJS framework, sometimes you may need to change some default timeout. You can define them just like you'd do in a plain Node.js HTTP server like so:

Back: a graphQL server built with Nestjs

NestJS - opinionated more scalable, but harder to learn docs

Pragmatically, we can apply this to a Nest application by creating an Interface for our services, separating the Presenter layer (Controller) from the Use Case (Services):

It’s a text document that contains all the commands a user could call to assemble an image. Let’s check an example of a Dockerfile for a nodejs app in this case it will be a NestJS app and then explain each part.

describe('Create bookmarks', () => { const dto: CreateBookmarkDto = { title: 'NestJS', link: 'https://nestjs.com/', }; it('should create bookmark', () => { return pactum .spec() .post('/bookmarks') .withHeaders({ Authorization: 'Bearer $S{userAt}', }) .withBody(dto) .expectStatus(201) .stores('bookmarkId', 'id')//store the bookmark id in the variable bookmarkId .expectBodyContains(dto.title) .expectBodyContains(dto.link) }); });

In my usual NodeJS tech stack, which includes GraphQL, NestJS, SQL (predominantly PostgreSQL with MikroORM), I encountered these limitations. To overcome them, I've developed a new stack utilizing Rust, which still offers some ease of development:

The purpose of this article is to provide a step-by-step guide for implementing authentication system in a NestJS project using the Passport middleware module.

That's exactly where I am. My manager gave me these links, that cover a lot of those words the backend uses, so I can identify what they mean and how to use them. 1. For inspiration and concepts: https://github.com/Sairyss/domain-driven-hexagon 2. Suggested to read the documentation for nest.js. They apply such concepts I don't understand: https://nestjs.com/