jina VS orchest

Jina mainly because of their use of neural networks and AI.

Jina - It’s an open-source project where you can build search engines. Well maybe not no code but it claims that you only need a few lines of code for creating projects. The project supports semantic, text, image, audio, and video search. What I’m also interested in is with their neural search and generative AI. I’m also interested in the amount of github repo that they have. I have this on my radar since this is also something I was interested in.

Do you guys have any ideas how we can match images on our database? We’re working on a project that about matching images on our database. We were trying to use SIFT and some other similar methods, but for some reason, nothing doesn’t seem to be working that well. Does anyone have any suggestions for the most effective way to do this? Maybe some open-source solutions like HuggingFace or Jina AI? We just want to make sure our image matching is correct and that part’s been a bit of a struggle on our part.

The tech lets you find 3D models without sifting through tons of text - An information retrieval framework does the heavy lifting and compares models to each other, no descriptions or keywords needed.

Jina AI -They offer a neural search solution that can help build smarter, more efficient search engines. They also have a list of cool github repos that you can check out. Similar to Vertex AI, they have image classification tools, NLPs, fine tuners etc.

Well, it's not exactly a new feature, but we've been working on early support for DocArray v2 in Jina.

Jina let’s you serve all of your models through the same Gateway while deploying them as individual microservices. You can also tie your models together in a pipeline if needed. Also some nice ML focussed features such as dynamic batching.

You can check out our OSS https://github.com/orchest/orchest

The code example is part of our ELT/data pipeline tool called Orchest: https://github.com/orchest/orchest/

First want to say congrats to the Patterns team for creating a gorgeous looking tool. Very minimal and approachable. Massive kudos!

Disclaimer: we're building something very similar and I'm curious about a couple of things.

One of the questions our users have asked us often is how to minimize the dependence on "product specific" components/nodes/steps. For example, if you write CI for GitHub Actions you may use a bunch of GitHub Action references.

Looking at the `graph.yml` in some of the examples you shared you use a similar approach (e.g. patterns/openai-completion@v4). That means that whenever you depend on such components your automation/data pipeline becomes more tied to the specific tool (GitHub Actions/Patterns), effectively locking in users.

How are you helping users feel comfortable with that problem (I don't want to invest in something that's not portable)? It's something we've struggled with ourselves as we're expanding the "out of the box" capabilities you get.

Furthermore, would have loved to see this as an open source project. But I guess the second best thing to open source is some open source contributions and `dcp` and `common-model` look quite interesting!

For those who are curious, I'm one of the authors of https://github.com/orchest/orchest

Haven't tried it. In its favor, Argo is vendor neutral and is really easy to set up in a local k8s environment like docker for desktop or minikube. If you already use k8s for configuration, service discovery, secret management, etc, it's dead simple to set up and use (avoiding configuration having to learn a whole new workflow configuration language in addition to k8s). The big downside is that it doesn't have a visual DAG editor (although that might be a positive for engineers having to fix workflows written by non-programmers), but the relatively bare-metal nature of Argo means that it's fairly easy to use it as an underlying engine for a more opinionated or lower-code framework (orchest is a notable one out now).

If you’d like to try something for you data workflows that’s vendor agnostic (k8s based) and open source you can check out our project: https://github.com/orchest/orchest

You can find it here: https://github.com/orchest/orchest Convenience install script: https://github.com/orchest/orchest#installation

We automatically provide container level parallelism in Orchest: https://github.com/orchest/orchest

For people in this thread interested in what this tool is an alternative to: Airflow, Luigi, Kubeflow, Kedro, Flyte, Metaflow, Sagemaker Pipelines, GCP Vertex Workbench, Azure Data Factory, Azure ML, Dagster, DVC, ClearML, Prefect, Pachyderm, and Orchest.

Disclaimer: author of Orchest https://github.com/orchest/orchest