iota
trust-dns
Our great sponsors
| iota | trust-dns | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 11 | |
| 1,573 | 3,040 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 9.2 | |
| 5 months ago | 2 days ago | |
| Rust | Rust | |
| MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
iota
-
CPU May Have Slowed Down on Wednesday
> but I'm sure it won't be able to open a 1KB text file instantaneously in 5 years
Unless you decide to switch to a modern console-based text editor. It doesn't have to be vim or emacs. There are many other alternatives. One new such editor written-in-Rust being Iota: https://github.com/gchp/iota
trust-dns
-
What would you rewrite in Rust?
You might be interested in Trust DNS - "A Rust based DNS client, server, and Resolver, built to be safe and secure from the ground up."
-
Announcing `async-dns`
It looks like you need to reach for a separate crate for that: https://github.com/bluejekyll/trust-dns/blob/7dcb7b983f5407d95d93b800af13caeee975aaa8/crates/async-std-resolver/src/lib.rs
This is not true; you can use the async resolver with other executors: https://github.com/bluejekyll/trust-dns/blob/main/crates/resolver/src/async_resolver.rs
-
Innernet: Open source Rust based Tailscale alternative by Tonari
You could run a local DNS server using something like https://github.com/bluejekyll/trust-dns . Or, you could install an NSS module to resolve names via the innernet client.
-
single-producer single-consumer concurrent queue
My point is that "implementation that doesn't use unsafe" is not necessarily always slower than "implementation that does use unsafe". Often people assume that this is the case, and it isn't. tinyvec currently beats smallvec in more than a few benchmarks. Not all, but some. And this sometimes visible to users. The point is that if you want speed, you don't necessarily need to give up any safety at all. Most differences in performance are due to the amount of effort or expertise that has been spent on the codebase, not the amount of unsafe in it.
What are some alternatives?
xi-editor - A modern editor with a backend written in Rust.
mdBook - Create book from markdown files. Like Gitbook but implemented in Rust
parity-bitcoin - The Parity Bitcoin client
rust-doom - A Doom Renderer written in Rust.
rim - Aspiring vim-like text editor
citybound - A work-in-progress, open-source, multi-player city simulation game.
rsedis - Redis re-implemented in Rust.
woodpecker - Drill is an HTTP load testing application written in Rust
tauri - Build smaller, faster, and more secure desktop applications with a web frontend.
oso - Oso is a batteries-included framework for building authorization in your application.
Parallel