infracost VS terraform-provider-openfaas

‍Infracost is a cost estimation tool that generates cost estimates for Terraform projects, which is crucial for budget planning and cost optimization, especially in cloud environments where resource costs can vary significantly.

Infracost is a tool that provides cloud cost estimates for infrastructure managed by Terraform. It enables engineers to view and understand the financial impact of their infrastructure changes before they are applied. Infracost integrates directly into the workflow, offering cost breakdowns in various environments like the terminal, Visual Studio Code, or directly within pull requests. This feature allows for more informed decision-making regarding infrastructure modifications, promoting cost-awareness and budget management in the early stages of development. Infracost is particularly useful for teams looking to balance cloud resource utilization with budget constraints. Infracost Cloud is their SaaS product that builds on top of Infracost open source and works with CI/CD integrations. It gives team leads, managers and FinOps practitioners dashboards, guardrails, centralized cost policies and Jira integration so they can help guide the team (e.g. switch AWS GP2 volumes to GP3).

Inevitable end for every open source company since the free money ended. What bothers me is that wording is vague enough.

> HashiCorp considers a competitive offering to be a product or service provided to users or customers outside of your organization that has significant overlap with the capabilities of HashiCorp’s commercial products or services.

So, consider there is no cost estimate service and you built a thing that got popular (https://github.com/infracost/infracost). Then after 2 years Terraform Cloud catches up. What happens? Are you out of business?

I've started to work on Carbonifer, a tool that can estimate carbon emissions before deploying an infrastructure. A bit like infracost, this reads Terraform files and estimates carbon emissions if this plan is applied.

Infracost is an open-source project that helps us understand how and where we’re spending our money. It gives a detailed breakdown of actual infrastructure costs and calculates how changes impact them. Basically, Infracost is a git diff for billing.

Infracost: Estimativas de custos nos Pull Requests.

There is some discussion on the infracost issue tracker where it looks like this specific error is more common with tgenv

Cost:Infracost (estimation): https://github.com/infracost/infracostTerratag (tagging): https://github.com/env0/terratag (disclaimer, I am CEO at env0)

I use https://infracost.io 🤗

Alex, OpenFaaS founder here. The author has done a huge amount of work here, I am surprised that it's being given away for free, and not being monetized (it should be).

I often hear folks complain that Kubernetes is complex, and hard to understand. We've done a lot of work to make the experience of deploying functions simple on K8s, with very little to manage. But it still costs you a K8s cluster.

We created a new of openfaas called "faasd" which can run very well somewhere like DO or Hetzner for 3 EUR / mo. It doesn't include clustering, but is likely to be suitable for a lot of folks, who don't want to get deep into IAM territory.

The REST API for OpenFaaS has a terraform provider that works with either version - https://github.com/ewilde/terraform-provider-openfaas

And there's a guide on setting up faasd with TLS on DigitalOcean, it took about 30 seconds to launch, and makes building functions much simpler than Lambda. "faas-cli up"

https://www.openfaas.com/blog/faasd-tls-terraform/

If I were going to use Lambda, the author's examples are probably what I would turn to, but there are other ways and it needn't be this complex.