infracost VS actions

‍Infracost is a cost estimation tool that generates cost estimates for Terraform projects, which is crucial for budget planning and cost optimization, especially in cloud environments where resource costs can vary significantly.

Infracost is a tool that provides cloud cost estimates for infrastructure managed by Terraform. It enables engineers to view and understand the financial impact of their infrastructure changes before they are applied. Infracost integrates directly into the workflow, offering cost breakdowns in various environments like the terminal, Visual Studio Code, or directly within pull requests. This feature allows for more informed decision-making regarding infrastructure modifications, promoting cost-awareness and budget management in the early stages of development. Infracost is particularly useful for teams looking to balance cloud resource utilization with budget constraints. Infracost Cloud is their SaaS product that builds on top of Infracost open source and works with CI/CD integrations. It gives team leads, managers and FinOps practitioners dashboards, guardrails, centralized cost policies and Jira integration so they can help guide the team (e.g. switch AWS GP2 volumes to GP3).

Inevitable end for every open source company since the free money ended. What bothers me is that wording is vague enough.

> HashiCorp considers a competitive offering to be a product or service provided to users or customers outside of your organization that has significant overlap with the capabilities of HashiCorp’s commercial products or services.

So, consider there is no cost estimate service and you built a thing that got popular (https://github.com/infracost/infracost). Then after 2 years Terraform Cloud catches up. What happens? Are you out of business?

I've started to work on Carbonifer, a tool that can estimate carbon emissions before deploying an infrastructure. A bit like infracost, this reads Terraform files and estimates carbon emissions if this plan is applied.

Infracost is an open-source project that helps us understand how and where we’re spending our money. It gives a detailed breakdown of actual infrastructure costs and calculates how changes impact them. Basically, Infracost is a git diff for billing.

Infracost: Estimativas de custos nos Pull Requests.

There is some discussion on the infracost issue tracker where it looks like this specific error is more common with tgenv

Cost:Infracost (estimation): https://github.com/infracost/infracostTerratag (tagging): https://github.com/env0/terratag (disclaimer, I am CEO at env0)

I use https://infracost.io 🤗

First, follow the instructions found here to download and authenticate Infracost. This includes creating an org inside the platform, which is where you can fetch the API key. Then we need a quick way to spin up some small AWS instances and then quickly dial them up to more expensive options.

I wanted to share an interesting learning from the open source project https://github.com/infracost/infracost/ and see what people think about writing policies for cloud costs using things like Open Policy Agent and HashiCorp Sentinel. For example: https://github.com/infracost/actions/tree/master/examples/opa

We couldn't wait either so we talked with other TFE users who were using Infracost and we learned from them to make an example of how to run it with GitHub Actions: https://github.com/infracost/actions/tree/master/examples/te...

We have similar examples for GitLab (https://gitlab.com/infracost/infracost-gitlab-ci/-/tree/mast...) and Azure DevOps (https://github.com/infracost/infracost-azure-devops/tree/mas...).

Happy to help with any issues via infracost.io/community-chat

I've recently been working on a new set of composable GitHub actions to run the open source Infracost project in CI/CD pipelines. For AWS, I see users using https://github.com/aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials to setup their creds (Terraform then uses those).