influxdb_iox VS arrow-datafusion

Watch out for the AGPL minio <https://github.com/metrico/iox-community/blob/155a14bb5e8e32...> the almost certainly AGPL grafana <https://github.com/grafana/grafana/blob/v10.1.1/LICENSE> and always eye anyone who uses :latest images with healthy suspicion

That said, influx_iox itself appears to be Apache 2 (and/or MIT?) https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb_iox/blob/main/LICENSE...

have you looked at https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb_iox ? that's where the development for the new version is done.

As I understand, InfluxDB 3 is just a re-branding of InfluxDB IOx. Then its' performance can be not very good comparing to Prometheus-like systems.

InfluxDB iox

Don't know how much is open or closed, but they were doing some development in the open: https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb_iox

Just want to say congratulations to the team!

2 years and 9,500+ commits is a hell of a feat.

https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb_iox

Already is: https://github.com/influxdata/influxdb_iox Just still a work in progress.

It looks like this crate is the workaround for that. But there's a PR on SQLX opened a couple days ago that will fix the issue.

You should check out polars, datafusion, influxdb iox and databend, all written in native Rust and powered by the Apache Arrow format. Polars in particular is pretty dam fast and has bindings for Python.

Python's Substrait seems like the biggest/most-used competitor-ish out there. I'd love some compare & contrast; my sense is that Substrait has a smaller ambition, and more wants to be a language for talking about execution rather than a full on execution engine. https://github.com/substrait-io/substrait

We can also see from the DataFusion discussion that they too see themselves as a bit of a Velox competitor. https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/discussions/6441

Agree, substrait is a really cool project! Related: if you like substrait you might want to check out datafusion too. The project is a query execution engine built on top of Apache Arrow (with SQL parser, query planner & optimizer, execution engine, extensible user defined functions, among others) and it implements a substrait provider and consumer: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/tree/main/datafus...

The draft contains some preliminary benchmark results, comparing it to DuckDB.

https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/6782

Apache Arrow is a pretty common memory structure these days. Datafusion is an open query engine built in Rust started by Andy Grove.

DuckDB is a great piece of software if you are

If you are looking for a query engine implemented in a safe language (Rust) I definitely suggest checking out DataFusion. It is comparable to DuckDB in performance, has all the standard built in SQL functionality, and is extensible in pretty much all areas (query language, data formats, catalogs, user defined functions, etc)

https://arrow.apache.org/datafusion/

Disclaimer I am a maintainer of DataFusion

https://github.com/jorgecarleitao/arrow2 https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista https://github.com/pola-rs/polars https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb

Problem comes when you want to do this inside an async context since we couldn't block an async task. https://users.rust-lang.org/t/sync-function-invoking-async/43364/6 You might need to do it in another runtime/thread. It is not recommended to do this, but sometimes it is unavoidable while implementing a third-party trait. https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/3777 However, I believe this isn't a problem particular to tokio, or any specific runtime.